Ruling goes against Phoenix artists; appeal planned

Friday, June 8, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Brush & Nib (calligraphy)Two Christian artists intend to appeal an Arizona court ruling rejecting artistic freedom.

The case involves Brush & Nib Studio in Phoenix. Owners Joana Duka and Breana Koski create hand-drawn invitations, paintings, and signs for weddings, businesses, and everyday moments. The problem? The Arizona capital has an ordinance that says Duka and Koski have to provide the same artwork for same-sex" weddings" – something the ladies say violates their deeply held religious beliefs.

The case went before the Arizona Court of Appeals, which ruled Thursday against the artists.

"Artists shouldn't be forced under threat of fines and jail time to create artwork contrary to their core convictions," says attorney Jonathan Scruggs of Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the law firm representing the artists. "The court's decision allows the government to compel two artists who happily serve everyone to convey a message about marriage they disagree with. This contradicts basic freedoms our nation has always cherished."

Scruggs

According to the attorney, the Phoenix law imposes "severe penalties" – specifically, a $2,500 fine, six months in jail, and three years of probation for every day a person failed to comply. "And every day is a new violation," he clarifies. "So that could really add up."

Pointing to Monday's Supreme Court decision in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, Scruggs says the Supreme Court reaffirmed that "religious and philosophical objections to gay marriage are protected views and in some instances protected forms of expression."

"Phoenix's position contradicts this principle and violates our clients' artistic and religious freedom," he continues. "We intend to appeal the court's decision."

ADF attorney Kristen Waggoner represented Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips before the U.S. Supreme Court, which said on Monday that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission violated Phillips' First Amendment rights over his religious objections to designing a same-sex "wedding" cake.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Which 'worldview' is the most dangerous for the future of the Church?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Hurricane Zeta hits the shores of Louisiana
Another night of riots and looting in Philadelphia
Social media CEOs are warned about anti-conservative bias
US to buy initial antibody doses from Eli Lilly
60 charged in $300M phone scam targeting elderly victims

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Ingraham: Americans will be 'stripped of any freedom' under Biden presidency, coronavirus lockdowns
The great COVID lie
The mobilization of the mob – including 'deep-staters'
How the left is using Americans' empathy and decency to destroy us
Tennessee school district bans ‘homosexuality is a sin’ shirt while allowing gay pride symbols: lawsuit

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
SCOTUS confirms the right to pray

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagJune brought plenty of big surprises from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), with a major one being the reversal of a case involving prayer.