At issue: The right to privacy in a school locker room

Wednesday, May 23, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

locker room 3The controversial bathroom and locker room policy of a Pennsylvania school district will be front and center on Thursday at the U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia.

In September 2016, the Boyertown Area School District began permitting transgender students to use the restrooms and locker rooms that correspond to the gender with which they identify – but attorney Randall Wenger of the Independence Law Center says that tramples on the dignity of all students.

"Our bodily privacy doesn't depend on another person's subjective beliefs, but on our bodily differences," Wenger tells OneNewsNow. "'Joel Doe,' our leading plaintiff, learned about these policies when he was standing in his underwear in the locker room and saw a girl [a transgender boy] who was stripped down to her bra – and so he and a number of other students went to see the principal afterwards. The principal told them 'tolerate it' and make it 'natural.'" (See earlier story)

If the same circumstances were in an employment context, Wenger argues that no one would tell a woman in a workplace to change with the guys and make it natural.

Wenger

"We would say that's sexual harassment," Wenger continues. "So we sued the school [in May 2017] for sexual harassment and violation of the right of bodily privacy. That went before the federal district court in Pennsylvania, and now the issue is before the U.S. Court of Appeals."

Wenger believes the case will eventually end up at the U.S. Supreme Court.

"There's only a limited number of cases out there like this in the country that are being litigated," the attorney says. "Most of the time, it's the student who identifies with the opposite sex trying to get the locker room opened up to them, but this case differs because it's the students who are seeking to maintain bodily privacy and claiming sexual harassment who are bringing the lawsuit."

Alliance Defending Freedom is working with Independence Law Center on this case.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Would you refuse to wear a symbol at work that conflicts with your personal beliefs?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

1 officer indicted in Breonna Taylor case
Fauci: Scientists may know about vaccine by Dec
Roberts: Ginsburg was 'tough, brave, a fighter, a winner'
Minnesota Public Radio head quits after employee diversity demands
Bus-size asteroid to zoom by Earth, ducking below satellites

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Mask fanatics have officially abandoned science to control your life
The idea of a pro-sports team going political is absurd
Trump strikes a second, massive blow against Critical Race theory
Language and thought
4 reasons lockdowns should end TODAY

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Christian baker to be baked or vindicated by SCOTUS?

Jack Phillips making cakeThe United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will soon issue its ruling on the Masterpiece Cakeshop lawsuit, and justices will decide a very fundamental question.