Another court hears fight over Pensacola cross

Wednesday, May 16, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Pensacola crossOral arguments are scheduled for today over a public cross that could be taken down if atheist plaintiffs succeed with their lawsuit.

The American Humanist Association (AHA) and the Freedom from Religion Foundation filed for summary judgment in April 2017 on behalf of local residents, arguing that the City of Pensacola's large cross, maintained by the city in a city park, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

The District Court ruled against the City in June 2017, and the City appealed a month later.

That brings the case to today's argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta, Georgia.

Erected in 1941, the cross has been included in Memorial Day and Veterans Day celebrations, and it was the site of a community-wide memorial site after the death of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

On the other side of the First Amendment issue is Becket attorney Joe Davis, who says the legal arguments against the cross are too broad.

"They effectively say that crosses are unconstitutional under the First Amendment, no matter what," Davis tells OneNewsNow.

"There's no other facts that's relevant other than that it's a cross," he continues, "and our view is that the Constitution is not a body of some sort of distinct hostility to one particular symbol."

Becket also contends in its court brief that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on an Establishment Clause test for legal purposes, which focuses on history and thus makes the historical cross legal and constitutional.

"So this cross has very much become a part of the fabric of Pensacola, for reasons religious and non-religious," Davis says. "And the point of this lawsuit is to erase that part of Pensacola's history."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

In this age of revisionism, should the Margaret Sanger display be removed from the Smithsonian?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Texas GOP votes to move convention online after court losses
4 charged in Los Angeles death of rising rapper Pop Smoke
Trump team eyes school funds boost in next virus aid bill
California shuts bars, indoor dining and most gyms, churches
Naya Rivera, who rose to fame on TV show 'Glee,' dies at 33
Federal judges halt two state pro-life laws
Judge blocks federal executions; administration appeals

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Jewish groups call out TV host Nick Cannon for defending Louis Farrakhan and spreading anti-Semitic conspiracies
Gang member turned activist says Trump has done what Obama did not
Plimoth Plantation in New England is changing its name to be more 'inclusive'
Why you should be optimistic about Trump winning
Time to end endless war in Afghanistan

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Christian baker to be baked or vindicated by SCOTUS?

Jack Phillips making cakeThe United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will soon issue its ruling on the Masterpiece Cakeshop lawsuit, and justices will decide a very fundamental question.