Another court hears fight over Pensacola cross

Wednesday, May 16, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Pensacola crossOral arguments are scheduled for today over a public cross that could be taken down if atheist plaintiffs succeed with their lawsuit.

The American Humanist Association (AHA) and the Freedom from Religion Foundation filed for summary judgment in April 2017 on behalf of local residents, arguing that the City of Pensacola's large cross, maintained by the city in a city park, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

The District Court ruled against the City in June 2017, and the City appealed a month later.

That brings the case to today's argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta, Georgia.

Erected in 1941, the cross has been included in Memorial Day and Veterans Day celebrations, and it was the site of a community-wide memorial site after the death of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

On the other side of the First Amendment issue is Becket attorney Joe Davis, who says the legal arguments against the cross are too broad.

"They effectively say that crosses are unconstitutional under the First Amendment, no matter what," Davis tells OneNewsNow.

"There's no other facts that's relevant other than that it's a cross," he continues, "and our view is that the Constitution is not a body of some sort of distinct hostility to one particular symbol."

Becket also contends in its court brief that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on an Establishment Clause test for legal purposes, which focuses on history and thus makes the historical cross legal and constitutional.

"So this cross has very much become a part of the fabric of Pensacola, for reasons religious and non-religious," Davis says. "And the point of this lawsuit is to erase that part of Pensacola's history."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I agree with this HHS proposal reversing the Obamacare section benefiting transgenders primarily because …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

‘We’re trapped’: Likely tornado rips through Oklahoma town
Iraq offers to mediate in crisis between its allies Iran, US
Venezuela negotiators return to Norway for crisis talks
Mike Pence: West Point grads should expect to see combat
Flooding leads to Oklahoma and Arkansas evacuations
New candidates vie to succeed UK’s May with focus on Brexit
Bolton says N. Korea missile tests violated UN resolutions

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Tornado strikes El Reno, Oklahoma; at least 2 deaths confirmed: reports
Thousands march in Hong Kong to commemorate June 4 protests
Israelis protest moves to grant Netanyahu immunity, limit Supreme Court
Video: Judge blocks part of Trump's border wall plan
Beto echoes Iranian propaganda, says Trump 'provoking another war' with troop increase

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Christian baker to be baked or vindicated by SCOTUS?

Jack Phillips making cakeThe United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will soon issue its ruling on the Masterpiece Cakeshop lawsuit, and justices will decide a very fundamental question.