Court botches decision over pro-abortion bill

Monday, March 5, 2018
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

judge banging gavelThe controversial bill, HB 40, essentially expands Medicaid, which means that the state of Illinois will be financing elective abortions and abortions for state employees – yet this piece of legislation is by no means your typical a pro-life versus pro-abortion argument.

At stake in the matter is what the United States Constitution actually requires of the General Assembly. In part, this entails estimating revenues and making specific revenue appropriations for the spending, which is estimated at $10 million to $33 million.

Thomas More Society Special Counsel Peter Breen filed suit to resolve the issue, and an appeals court rejected the case on two grounds.

“They ruled that the court system couldn't at all evaluate, review or in any way comment on appropriations, so that's money being spent by the General Assembly – and on its legality,” More explained. “We think that's outrageous. That's what the courts exist to do.”

Secondly, it should be noted that if a bill is pending after May 31, it cannot be implemented for one year, but the state is now slated to start financing abortions starting January 1. Breen maintains that this violates both the Constitution and state law.

“The courts exist to hold that General Assembly in line – and the executive branch agencies in line,” Breen pointed out. “They're going to spend the money, so, if the courts back off of interpreting the state constitution – of enforcing the laws – then, really, it does raise the questions, ‘What are the courts there to do and what do the laws mean?’ [as well as] ‘What does the Constitution of the State of Illinois mean?’”

Thomas More Society has appealed the problematic decision in the case to the Illinois Supreme Court.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

If you were to give President Trump high marks in particular areas of policy, what areas would they be?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  With eyes on midterms, Trump embraces immigration fight
  Trump administration pulls US out of UN human rights council
  Trump, GOP leaders strain for migrant-kids solution
  5 charged in 'smuggling scheme' after fatal crash in Texas
Army boots West Point grad who touted communist revolt
S. Korea: Joint U.S. drills suspended to aid talks with North
China hopes for implementation of NKorea-U.S. summit outcome

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump huddles with House GOP on immigration as border outrage escalates
Strzok escorted out of FBI, but remains on job
Colorado governor bars state funds from being used for separation of illegal immigrant families
AG Sessions: Trump knows religious freedom is a right, not a policy preference
Ann Coulter: Migrant kids at border are 'actors'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Mayor to Calif. AG: Do your state a favor and reprioritize

California sanctuary stateA California mayor suggests the state's attorney general needs to concentrate more on prosecuting dangerous illegal alien criminals – and less on defending the state's sanctuary policy.