Your clothes could steal your vote

Monday, February 26, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

"I voted today" t-shirtWhat you wear to vote in future elections could be determined by an upcoming Supreme Court case.

The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, and oral argument is scheduled for February 28. At issue is a Minnesota law that forbids voters from wearing "any political badge, political button, or other political insignias." Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) says this open-ended language gives polling place workers unbridled discretion to ban anything that might be interpreted as even slightly ideological, even if it has no relation to any candidate, party, or ballot proposal.

"Nine other states have similar laws," PLF attorney Wen Fa notes. "Delaware, for example, bans political discussion of issues, candidates, or partisan topics, the wearing of any button, banner, or other object referring to issues, candidates, or partisan topics on election day; and Vermont law specifies that no political badge, button, or insignia may be worn in a polling place when the polling place is open for voting.”

So, in practice, according to Fa, voters across the country are harassed at polling places or prevented from voting altogether for wearing innocuous T-shirts.

Fa

"You have poll workers stopping college students wearing M.I.T. sweatshirts in Colorado and Florida because poll workers thought the students were campaigning for Mitt Romney," Fa continues.

"One woman tried to vote in Austin, Texas, during the 2012 election and was compelled to cover her 'Vote The Bible' shirt. Other voters in Texas got in trouble for wearing Dallas Cowboys apparel when a stadium finance issue was on the ballot. In Colorado, a [Denver] Broncos T-shirt caused a problem because a stadium tax issue was on the ballot."

A voter in Houston, Texas, in 2008 reportedly almost lost her right to vote just because she wore a souvenir "Alaska" shirt that was misconstrued as support for Sarah Palin.

"Voters wearing a shirt that said 'Me Too' or a Colin Kaepernick jersey could be prosecuted for violating the law in Minnesota or another state with a ban on political apparel," says Fa. "All these scenarios are possible, if not likely, under Minnesota law."

Vote Here (sign)A diverse group of organizations from the Cato Institute to the ACLU have filed briefs in support of PLF's case.

"We're fighting not just for the rights of our clients to wear Tea Party shirts in Minnesota. We're also fighting for the rights of voters to wear shirts that say Chamber of Commerce, AFLCIO, NRA, NAACP, and countless other messages at the polling place," Fa adds. "With Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, we're aiming to vindicate the free-speech rights of all Americans – liberals and conservatives … whatever they may wear to the polling place."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Bottom line: What's the REAL reason Democrats' are so adamant about blocking Kavanaugh's confirmation?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump wants to rid Justice Department of 'lingering stench'
Gunmen attack Iran military parade, killing at least 24
Committee gives Kavanaugh accuser more time
Survivor found inside capsized Tanzania ferry; toll hits 167
GOP, Kavanaugh accuser in standoff over her Senate testimony
Cruz, O'Rourke trade attacks during testy 1st Texas debate
When will it end? Florence's floodwaters rising in Carolinas

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Grassley grants Kavanaugh accuser another extension
UK leader May hits back on Brexit plan; Pound falls
Schumer rallies behind Rosenstein, warns Trump not to fire him
Rosenstein reportedly discussed wearing 'wire,' invoking 25th Amendment against Trump
OH-Sen: Sherrod Brown says he's 'not close' to wanting to run for president in 2020

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Dems' 'attack' on Nunes memo a 'big fat dud'

angry donkey (Democrats)A constitutional attorney insists that the much-hyped Democratic FISA memo has proven to be a "big fat dud."