Unions about to find out about Gorsuch

Tuesday, February 20, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Supreme Court justices 2017The newest face on the U.S. Supreme Court may be the deciding vote in an upcoming case involving union dues.

The case is Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 31. The Supreme Court is being asked to overturn a 41-year-old ruling that allows unions to collect so-called "fair share" fees from employees who are not union members. As The Associated Press reports, America's union leaders are about to find out if they were right to fiercely oppose Neil Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court as a pivotal, potentially devastating vote against organized labor.

AFSCME president Lee Saunders has called the case an effort to chip away at the power of unions "to negotiate a fair return on our work, provide for our families, and lift up the concerns of all working families."

This is not the first time Gorsuch (back row, far right in photo above) has been considered a major factor in the Janus case. In a 2017 interview, Mark Mix of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. – the organization representing Mark Janus before the Supreme Court – said Gorsuch is likely to be the decisive vote on this issue.

Mix

"Janus is following in the footsteps of in the Supreme Court case, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association," explains Mix. "Like Friedrichs, Janus argues that being forced to pay dues to a union violates the First Amendment rights of government employees."

Oral arguments the first time around wrapped up just before Justice Antonin Scalia died in February 2016.

"While Friedrichs deadlocked 4-4 after Justice Scalia's death, the confirmation of Justice Gorsuch offers a new opportunity for the Supreme Court to rule public-sector forced dues unconstitutional," Mix adds.

Gorsuch – President Trump's only Supreme Court appointment thus far – was confirmed in April 2017.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What is the most important issue raised during the congressional hearing with Google's CEO?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  White House dismisses Cohen accusations as lies
  Pair of abortion restrictions in Ohio head to Kasich's desk
Florida Senate won't block election chief's suspension
  McCain replacement Sen. Jon Kyl resigning at end of year
  Authorities probe why suspect wasn't stopped
Israeli troops arrest dozens in West Bank raid
  UK's May sticks to her Brexit plan despite rebuff from EU

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Dershowitz: Cohen doesn't seem to understand the difference between 'wrong' and 'illegal'
Feds collect record taxes through November; still run $305.4B deficit
Communist officials threatening Cuban pastors
Former FEC commissioners: Trump-Cohen 'hush' payments not necessarily a violation
Jared Kushner as next chief of staff? Reports say Trump is considering it

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Dems' 'attack' on Nunes memo a 'big fat dud'

angry donkey (Democrats)A constitutional attorney insists that the much-hyped Democratic FISA memo has proven to be a "big fat dud."