State AGs backing filmmakers under fire for their faith

Wednesday, February 14, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward, Jody Brown (OneNewsNow.com)

Carl and Angel Larsen (filmmakers)Several states and legal scholars are expressing their support for artistic freedom and religious expression in a legal challenge involving two Minnesota filmmakers who are facing possible fines and even jail time for living out their faith.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit has received several friend-of-the-court briefs, including one filed by ten states, in support of the artistic freedom of Carl and Angel Larsen, owners of Telescope Media Group. The Christian filmmakers are challenging the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), saying it requires them to use their talents to promote same-sex "marriages" if they produce films that celebrate marriage between one man and one woman. Violators of the law face fines and jail time.

The Larsens, who are represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, asked a federal district court for an injunction that would suspend enforcement of the law against them while their case proceeds. The court denied that request and instead ruled in favor of the state's motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which means the Larsens have to continue censoring their own speech about marriage to avoid violating the law.

ADF attorney Jeremy Tedesco explains that his clients have filed an appeal with the 8th Circuit, asking that the lawsuit be reinstated.

Tedesco, Jeremy (ADF)Ten states have now filed a brief – signed by their respective attorneys general – in support of the Larsens: Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and West Virginia. Tedesco says those states understand that the government should not threaten artists with fines and jail time simply for living out their beliefs in the marketplace.

"Utilizing the weight of government power to order individuals to speak in a manner that violates their conscience is fundamentally at odds with the freedom of expression and tolerance for a diversity of viewpoints that this nation has long enjoyed and promoted," the attorney states.

Obviously the ten AGs who filed the supporting brief agree:

"... The Supreme Court has consistently ... upheld the principle that the government cannot force individuals to speak or adhere to an ideology with which they disagree. When a law effectively compels a person both to create expression and to participate in an expressive event, as does the MHRA, the application of that law to that person triggers heightened scrutiny under the First Amendment." [p. 10]

Almost a dozen legal scholars have joined the Cato Institute in another friend-of-the-court brief in support of the Larsens.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Are you surprised a Dem leader is blaming pastors for pushing a conservative message?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Some US troops to leave border this week
Snowed-in South makes the best of day off from work, school
Macron vows tax relief, urges calm in bid to quell protests
UK PM May postpones vote on Brexit deal with EU
China pressures US, Canada ahead of Huawei hearing

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Justice Thomas blasts SCOTUS for sidestepping Planned Parenthood: “Quit abdicating our judicial duty”
SCOTUS rejects bid to reinstate Louisiana law punishing Planned Parenthood
Corsi sues Mueller over alleged grand jury leaks, seeks $350M in damages: report
Judge orders new fact-finding in Clinton email scandal, hits Hillary with scathing critique
Supreme Court expert: Politics strongly impacts judges' decisions

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Dems' 'attack' on Nunes memo a 'big fat dud'

angry donkey (Democrats)A constitutional attorney insists that the much-hyped Democratic FISA memo has proven to be a "big fat dud."