Any bets on how SCOTUS will rule in NCAA case?

Thursday, November 30, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

sports betting gamblingThe future of sports betting may be determined by an upcoming Supreme Court case, but there are many implications for states depending on how the high court rules.

Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association involves New Jersey's attempt to legalize sports betting under Governor Chris Christie (R-New Jersey). For over half a century, most states have had laws on the books barring sports betting – but some states have started to view it as a potential way to create jobs and generate revenue by opening up casinos and allowing for sports betting to be legal.

"There is a federal law, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, that effectively bars states from repealing their existing laws against sports betting," says Elizabeth Slattery, legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation. (Read her related article)

"That might seem a little confusing, but basically the federal government understands that under the 10th Amendment, they can't force states to enact a law banning sports betting, but what they are saying they can do is require states to keep those existing laws on the books."

New Jersey argues this is effectively a form of commandeering the states into the service of the federal government and that it violates the Garden State's sovereignty to pass laws regulating the private conduct of their citizens.

Slattery

"If this type of arrangement is upheld by the Supreme Court, it could have implications for whether states decide to keep on the books concealed carry laws for handguns or it could have implications for states' decisions to allow the recreational use of marijuana," Slattery believes.

"Obviously there are high stakes in the case because it deals with sports betting and we have the NCAA on one side, and New Jersey on the other, so I think it's going to be an interesting one to watch and maybe some interesting language on this sort of anti-commandeering doctrine."

Arguments are scheduled for Monday, December 4.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction after learning Peter Strzok was escorted out of the FBI building this week?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

GOP struggles to salvage immigration bill, postpones vote
ABC orders 'Roseanne' spinoff for fall minus Roseanne Barr
Charles Krauthammer, prominent conservative voice, has died
2 Koreas meet to arrange reunions of war-split families
House rejects conservative immigration bill, postpones vote on another
Trump's immigration order sparks confusion, deep concern
White House proposes merging education, labor

LATEST FROM THE WEB

FBI: Sexual assaults increasing on flights, women and unaccompanied kids at highest risk
NATO chief says alliance might not survive
Chris Pratt uncorks some truth in a Hollywood culture of lies
DOJ employee among commie mob that hounded DHS Secretary out of Mexican restaurant
Rise of the robots: A bad argument for a bigger welfare state

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Atlanta's 'inclusivity' actually isn't, says attorney

Kelvin Cochran (former Atlanta fire chief)While many people are gearing up for Supreme Court arguments over the rights of a religious baker, a case involving the rights of a religious fire chief also remains up in the air.