Minnesota's voter dress code unconstitutional?

Wednesday, November 15, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

voting in AmericaThe United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will hear arguments over Minnesota's controversial dress code for voters.

Minnesota has a law that bans any apparel that could be interpreted as political from being worn inside a polling area.

This means that T-shirts saying “Chamber of Commerce,” “AFL-CIO,” “NAACP” and “Don't Tread On Me” are in the same category as “Vote for Trump” or “Vote for Hillary.”

Attorney Wen Fa of Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) maintains that this prohibitive law is a violation of the First Amendment. He is assisting the plaintiffs in the lawsuit known as Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky.

"Pacific Legal Foundation … litigates cases for liberty in courts across the United States, and one of those courts is the Supreme Court of the United States, where we have had a tremendous run of success, including nine Supreme Court wins in our last 10 cases," Fa told OneNewsNow. "I found out about this case by basically reading a newspaper article and I said, 'Wow, something like this couldn't exist and it certainly would violate the First Amendment,' so I contacted the counsel representing the parties, and that's how we got involved."

Fa informed that SCOTUS has been very friendly to those who champion First Amendment rights in the past.

"Basically, Minnesota has created a speech-free zone at the polling place and speech-free zones, as the Supreme Court has held [that these] are inconsistent with the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment," the legal expert explained. "It's a law that bans speech of people – regardless of their views – and that's why I think that justices on either side of the conservative-liberal divide – if you want to call it that – would be interested in taking this case and invalidating this case as a violation of the First Amendment."

Arguments have not yet been scheduled, but Fa believes that they will take place early next year.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your impression of the candid look into the Trump/Pelosi/Schumer interchange in the Oval Office?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

France's Macron caught between protests, Strasbourg attack
Gunman from Christmas market attack in France still at large
Official IDs Canadian missing in China as entrepreneur
Pilot seriously injured after military jet crash off Hawaii
British PM Theresa May survives 'no confidence' vote
Ex-Trump lawyer Cohen gets 3 years in prison
Magnitude 4.4 earthquake jolts Tennessee; felt in Atlanta

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Melania Trump tells Fox News she does what's 'right,' despite media criticism
Ken Starr strikes again -- with Kavanaugh
Liberal protesters target home of Trump aide Stephen Miller over immigration policies
GOP senator: 'I think we're going to have a shutdown'
Opinion: Pelosi's 'immoral' border wall argument

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Any bets on how SCOTUS will rule in NCAA case?

sports betting gamblingThe future of sports betting may be determined by an upcoming Supreme Court case, but there are many implications for states depending on how the high court rules.