Corporations lobby SCOTUS on Masterpiece case

Friday, November 3, 2017
Chris Woodward (

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagA homosexual-rights organization is lining up big-name corporations for a new lobbying effort: convince the U.S. Supreme Court to force a Christian baker to violate his conscience.

Anticipating the Dec. 12 oral arguments from Colorado baker Jack Phillips, the Human Rights Campaign has convinced Apple, Amazon, Citi, and Marriott to sign their names to a friend-of-the-court brief that will be reviewed by the justices.

The Masterpiece Cake Shop case is viewed as a looming landmark decision after the controversial Obergefell decision in 2015, which delighted homosexual-rights supporters by finding an Equal Protection right for homosexual marriage in the U.S. Constitution. 

"Businesses that are open to the public should be open to anyone and should not discriminate based on an individual's identity," a spokesperson for the HRC said in an Oct. 31 media call in which OneNewsNow participated.

Jack Phillips on "The View""When they offer a good or service to the public," the spokesperson continued, "that should be offered to anyone who is able to purchase that service, and there shouldn't be an exception for wedding-related services."

Yet the Colorado baker and others who have run afoul of liberal anti-discrimination laws have repeatedly insisted that they never turned away customers due to their "identify"– homosexual or otherwise. What they turned away, instead, was an order they refused to fill for moral reasons.

"If I was judging people, I wouldn't allow them in my store," Phillips (pictured above) told the left-wing hosts of "The View" in July, shortly after the high court announced it would hear the case, which began with a lawsuit in 2012. 

Phillips went on state that he has also turned down orders for bawdy-themed bachelor cakes and Halloween cakes with evil-themed decorations.  

natural marriageThat stance mirrors the policy of Blaine Adamson, a Kentucky print shop owner who turned down a t-shirt order for a gay rights parade. Sued by a local human rights commission, Adamson won his legal fight after telling the court he has turned down business from a strip club while he has fulfilled orders from homosexual customers in the past.

OneNewsNow reported in a 2015 story that a lesbian business owner came to Adamson's defense, pointing out that her online print business could be forced, for example, to print anti-gay messages for the controversial Westboro Baptist Church. Yet that view is rare among homosexual activists - at least in public - who equate the Masterpiece case to a 21st century civil rights issue. 

Just because the current culture suggests a man should be able to marry a man, and a woman should be able to marry a woman, the culture should not force an artist to participate in that event, says Robert Kuykendall of 2nd Vote.

gay flag waving outside SCOTUS"And that's essentially what Jack Phillips is. He's an artist and he expresses himself through his cakes," he says, "And when it comes to being involved in a wedding, a wedding vendor does not provide just a service or provide a good to be picked up. They are intimately involved with an event that is more than just a simple business transaction."

Regarding HRC and its corporate allies, Kuykendall says most Americans would be appalled to learn that these well-known corporations have joined with the homosexual lobbying group to fight a Christian baker in a landmark legal case that affects religious liberties. 

"Essentially with this case, the Masterpiece Cakes case is a religious liberty issue," he says. "And HRC, the LGBT left and these companies like Marriott, Apple and Citi, want to say you have to participate in a same-sex wedding, even if your religious belief says that marriage is between one man and one woman."


We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details





Your reaction to the positive job numbers released on Friday?





Biden formally clinches Democratic presidential nomination
Facebook removes nearly 200 accounts tied to hate groups
Barr says he didn’t give tactical order to clear protesters
Citing jobs, Trump claims victory over virus, econ collapse
Black cops feel pain of Floyd's death, duty to their uniform


Pete Hegseth blasts DC mayor, says National Guard prevented desecration of monuments
Jeff Sessions shuts down Ilhan Omar in Twitter spat, then asks: 'How's your brother, by the way?'
California Gov. Newsom wants to set use-of-force standard
Drew Brees sends a message to President Trump about his comments on kneeling protests
Maxine Waters freaks out: Remove Trump 'before this would-be dictator takes us all down'


Cartoon of the Day
Any bets on how SCOTUS will rule in NCAA case?

sports betting gamblingThe future of sports betting may be determined by an upcoming Supreme Court case, but there are many implications for states depending on how the high court rules.