And the winner is ... the surrogacy industry

Wednesday, November 1, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts, Jody Brown (OneNewsNow.com)

surrogacy pregnancyAfter a recent decision out of the California Supreme Court, other states may wish to refine their child surrogacy laws.

A pro-life woman in California who entered into a contract to be a surrogate mother was confirmed pregnant with triplets in September 2015. But the biological father decided to only accept twins and – pursuant to the terms of the contract – instructed her to abort the third baby. She refused and filed suit. After lower courts (including the California Supreme Court) upheld the right of the sperm donor, the case (C.M. v. M.C.) was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court where, early last month, the high court refused to hear the case.

Shortly after the suit was originally filed, the surrogate mother went into labor two months early and gave birth in February 2016 – but her parental rights had already been terminated and the biological father was legally declared the sole parent of the three infants. The preemies remained in NICU for three months, with neither a mother nor a father at their sides.

The 51-year-old biological father, according to his sister, is deaf and mute, lives with his elderly invalid parents, and is unable to care for the three children – who are now 18 months old. The sister also claims the children live in deplorable conditions in the basement of her parents' home. (More details at LifesiteNews.com)

Brad Dacus, attorney and president of the Pacific Justice Institute, tells OneNewsNow the high court's refusal to hear the case means surrogacy will flourish – but he argues the law is faulty.

"There's no safeguard to ensure that that parent is having that child for the proper motive," Dacus says. "It almost creates a commoditizing of children, and that can be very, very dangerous for our society and for humanity."

Dacus, Brad (PJI)The attorney argues that no child should be a commodity to be bought and sold. At the same time, he contends surrogacy should be available for couples who are unable to conceive their own child. But that leaves room for a dilemma such as that of the California surrogate who fought for the life of all three children she carried.

Dacus said no woman who's carrying a child or children should ever be forced to abort one of the children.

"For such a provision to be enforced would have a grave consequence not only for the unborn, who's going to be killed, but also for the surrogate mother who is carrying the child," he states.

According to court documents, the surrogate – in response to the donor's instructions that she abort one of the children – had offered to raise the child instead.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

It appears Democrats view healthcare as the major issue for the 2020 election – do you agree?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Saudi Arabia: Drone attacks knocked out half its oil supply
Several injured when decks collapse during firefighter event
Trump backs a Netanyahu priority ahead of Israeli election
White House says bin Laden son killed in US operation
In Alaska hometown, Native women say police ignored rapes
Skirmishes break out in Hong Kong mall amid counter rallies

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Pompeo accuses Iran of 'unprecedented attack' after drones hit Saudi oil facilities
Trump, Saudi Crown Prince speak on refinery attack, SPA says
Top Dem senator warns Beto O'Rourke's gun confiscation threat will badly backfire on Democrats
Abortion doctor's family finds remains of more than 2,200 fetuses at his home
Opinion — Joseph diGenova: McCabe prosecution would start holding Obama officials responsible

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Any bets on how SCOTUS will rule in NCAA case?

sports betting gamblingThe future of sports betting may be determined by an upcoming Supreme Court case, but there are many implications for states depending on how the high court rules.