Supreme Court plaza policy challenged, again

Monday, June 19, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Supreme CourtFree speech is constitutionally protected – but not at the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Rutherford Institute has previously filed lawsuits on behalf of people who want to quietly demonstrate at the nation's highest court. Their latest filing was on behalf of two Christians who are against war and wanted to hold signs reflecting that view while on the huge Supreme Court plaza.

Institute founder John Whitehead tells OneNewsNow the lawsuit (Payden-Travers v. Talkin) was based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but he adds that a federal judge dismissed the case.

"The Supreme Court had, in the past, basically passed a law saying that people can't be out there, backing up a 60-year-old law, which says – believe it or not – that it's unlawful to display any flag, banner, or device that portrays a message," Whitehead explains. "This means Girl Scouts wanting to sell cookies on the front of that large plaza could be run off."

According to Whitehead, the original purpose of the rule was to make sure justices aren't influenced by demonstrations, but he questions if any such influence could really happen now.

Whitehead, John (Rutherford Institute)"If you think about it," the attorney suggests, "the Supreme Court justices arrive in limousines through an underground entrance with guards around them. I doubt they ever even take a look out there [to the plaza]. They can on the surveillance cameras, but I don't think two peace activists are in any way going to sway a Supreme Court decision."

Finally, Whitehead says that according to federal law, "the government must have a compelling interest in order to violate free speech and the religious guarantees of the Constitution."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Who do you believe when you hear them talk about the Republican tax reform bill?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

'This is happening': GOP revels in all-but-certain tax deal
On Trump turf, GOP still seeks N.D. Senate candidate
Major media players start commission for sexual misconduc
Latest: South Africa ruling party meets to choose leader
Moore tells supporters 'battle is not over' in Senate race
Border arrests surge, erasing much of Trump's early gains
Army of firefighters takes on still-growing California fire

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump ally Roger Stone cleared in NY defamation case
One obvious detail revealed this 'Green Beret' was a total fraud
EU agrees clampdown on bitcoin platforms to tackle money laundering
Kansas Democrat Andrea Ramsey drops out of House race over 2005 harassment suit
Ranchers defeat Big Brother in property rights fight

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Rainbow flag OK, but national motto crosses the line

Houston police cruiser with rainbow decalsGovernment agencies, including police departments, have raised a question during "gay pride" month that a constitutional attorney suggests ought to be answered.