Attorney: Mutilation not a protected religious practice

Thursday, June 15, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

illustration of mosqueA constitutional law expert contends religious freedom is no justification for upholding the genital mutilation of young girls.

Three people, including a doctor, face charges in Detroit federal court for performing the mutilations. All three are members of the Shia Muslim sect Dawoodi Bohra. Well-known liberal civil rights attorney Alan Dershowitz will represent them, claiming constitutional protections for free exercise of religion.

But attorney Rob Muise of the American Freedom Law Center says not all religious practices are protected by the Constitution. In addition in 1995 Congress passed a law banning the practice.

"Under the First Amendment – under the Free Exercise Clause, in particular – the law that's being applied, in this case the federal criminal law that prohibits female genital mutilation, is a neutral law of general applicability," he explains, "meaning that it applies to all persons. It doesn't focus on any one particular religion. So then, you don't have a free-exercise claim to begin with."

Defense attorneys will also claim the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed in 1993, requires an overwhelming government interest in order to violate religious freedom.

Muise, Robert (AFLC)"I certainly think that the criminal law will prevail," Muise tells OneNewsNow, "because the government has a compelling interest to prohibit this practice, which injures these young girls for life."

According to The Detroit News, the doctor is accused of mutilating the genitalia of two seven-year-old girls. The thinking behind the brutal practice is to help girls remain pure until marriage, and to give them no interest in straying once they are married.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How would you respond if a basketball player continued to warm-up during the national anthem?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Palestinian official balking at US 'extortion or pressure'
Latest: Hariri will return to Lebanon soon amidst crisis
Latest: Ryan Seacrest denies inappropriate behavior
100 full moons: Blazing fireball lights up Arctic sky
U.S. puts Palestinians on notice: DC office may be shuttered
California's legal pot countdown: What's coming by Jan. 1
Nevada wants to use untried execution drugs that pose risks

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Progressives call for replacing Al Franken with Keith Ellison as support for resignation builds
GOP official in NH urges Bill Clinton's name be dropped from state Democratic dinner
US Navy: U.S. destroyer slightly damaged in collision w/tug off Japan
'Enormous number' of parasites in N. Korean defector's body, doctors say
Al Franken falls from 'Democratic darling to dirty old man'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Rainbow flag OK, but national motto crosses the line

Houston police cruiser with rainbow decalsGovernment agencies, including police departments, have raised a question during "gay pride" month that a constitutional attorney suggests ought to be answered.