Attorney: Mutilation not a protected religious practice

Thursday, June 15, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

illustration of mosqueA constitutional law expert contends religious freedom is no justification for upholding the genital mutilation of young girls.

Three people, including a doctor, face charges in Detroit federal court for performing the mutilations. All three are members of the Shia Muslim sect Dawoodi Bohra. Well-known liberal civil rights attorney Alan Dershowitz will represent them, claiming constitutional protections for free exercise of religion.

But attorney Rob Muise of the American Freedom Law Center says not all religious practices are protected by the Constitution. In addition in 1995 Congress passed a law banning the practice.

"Under the First Amendment – under the Free Exercise Clause, in particular – the law that's being applied, in this case the federal criminal law that prohibits female genital mutilation, is a neutral law of general applicability," he explains, "meaning that it applies to all persons. It doesn't focus on any one particular religion. So then, you don't have a free-exercise claim to begin with."

Defense attorneys will also claim the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed in 1993, requires an overwhelming government interest in order to violate religious freedom.

Muise, Robert (AFLC)"I certainly think that the criminal law will prevail," Muise tells OneNewsNow, "because the government has a compelling interest to prohibit this practice, which injures these young girls for life."

According to The Detroit News, the doctor is accused of mutilating the genitalia of two seven-year-old girls. The thinking behind the brutal practice is to help girls remain pure until marriage, and to give them no interest in straying once they are married.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I agree with this HHS proposal reversing the Obamacare section benefiting transgenders primarily because …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Mike Pence: West Point grads should expect to see combat
Flooding leads to Oklahoma and Arkansas evacuations
New candidates vie to succeed UK’s May with focus on Brexit
Bolton says N. Korea missile tests violated UN resolutions
‘Revolution’ in Poland as nation confronts priestly abuse
'Here we go again': Judge blocks Mississippi abortion ban
US beefing up forces in Middle East to counter Iran
Wisconsin man who kidnapped Jayme Closs gets life in prison

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Video: Judge blocks part of Trump's border wall plan
Beto echoes Iranian propaganda, says Trump 'provoking another war' with troop increase
Facebook defends not pulling controversial video of Pelosi
Trump arrives in Japan, kicking off 4-day state visit with trade talks at its center
CAIR says 'Aladdin' film will worsen Islamophobia and racism because it's being released under President Trump

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Rainbow flag OK, but national motto crosses the line

Houston police cruiser with rainbow decalsGovernment agencies, including police departments, have raised a question during "gay pride" month that a constitutional attorney suggests ought to be answered.