Attorney: Planned Parenthood can't claim 'privacy'

Friday, April 7, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Capture from CMP video #5A legal expert argues that two undercover pro-life citizen reporters who are facing felony charges aren't guilty of violating California's privacy laws.

David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt secretly recorded ranking officials of Planned Parenthood as well as other abortion industry workers discussing selling limbs, organs, and tissue from aborted babies. California Attorney General Xavier Bacerra has lodged 15 felony charges against them for violating his state's privacy laws.

But Dr. Jenna Ellis, an assistant professor of legal studies at Colorado Christian University, tells OneNewsNow those laws state that privacy is just that.

"... Many of the videos not only were recorded in public, at restaurants and so forth, but the Ninth Circuit has also said that the right to privacy is something that belongs to an individual, not a corporation," explains the licensed attorney who specializes in constitutional law. "And so Planned Parenthood cannot assert an invasion of privacy for their business practices."

Ellis

Ironically, she says, the right of privacy under those laws would be owned by the preborn child – and confidentiality would come into play only if the content of the conversation is private and personal to the individual being recorded.

"... So this would have to be something that was private and personal to the actual abortionists themselves rather than about the business practices or anything else regarding Planned Parenthood," the educator notes. "So this shouldn't apply at all to David Daleiden or Sandra Merritt."

Ellis says the charges are an overreach on the part of the attorney general, that California is a progressive/activist state, and that the charges have been brought "more as an aggressive agenda tactic rather than actually supporting what California law says."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Are you surprised a prominent Democrat is questioning the usefulness of the U.S. Constitution?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump plans ‘major announcement’ on border, longest shutdown
Trump fires back after Mueller disputes accuracy of report
Wild week over Brexit leaves British politics in crisis mode
Trump plans big announcement on Saturday on shutdown, border
White cop who shot black teen gets nearly 7 years in prison
Supreme Court inaction suggests DACA safe for another year

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Networks spend over 27 minutes on dubious BuzzFeed Trump story
Winter storm sweeping across US, with more than 100M Americans in its path
Mueller team disputes BuzzFeed report claiming Trump told Cohen to lie
Trump administration expands grounding of gov't jets
CNN panel is stunned by host's bizarre question about Karen Pence teaching at Christian school

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Trump vows to fight but bureaucracy vows to block

judge banging gavelA former U.S. Justice Department attorney says it won't be so easy for the Trump-led DOJ to defeat a federal judge's order that blocked the President's plan to withhold funds from "sanctuary cities."