Battling for CPCs' right to stay true to purpose

Tuesday, March 15, 2016
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

crisis pregnancy centerAttorneys are preparing for a court battle over a California pro-life law that an attorney says could eventually impact the free-speech rights of everyone.

The California law forces pro-life pregnancy centers – often called "crisis pregnancy centers" (CPCs) – to provide bold notices in their offices and in advertising that they do not provide abortions or birth control, and to post where abortions are available and the best prices. Lawsuits were filed in state and federal courts to block AB-775, and thus far four judges have decided not to block the law from going into effect.

Despite the suits going 0-for-4 in court rulings, Brad Dacus of the Pacific Justice Institute remains confident of victory in the end.

"A reasonable jurist cannot find that it's constitutional for the government to compel a private, religious, non-profit ministry serving women to have to violate their beliefs and speak something and advertise something that's totally against their very purpose for existence," Dacus argues.

In the most recent rejection, a federal judge in San Diego wrote that the new state law simply "requires medical providers to advise their patients of various types of treatment available" so they are "fully informed when making decision regarding their pregnancies."

Dacus, Brad (PJI)While Dacus is disappointed by the rejection of the requests for injunctions to block the law, he points out it's not the final word because all the cases have yet to go to trial. The cases are vital, he argues – and not just for pro-life pregnancy centers.

"We have to reverse this," he urges, "because otherwise the government will have as a matter of precedent the right to be able to compel private individuals, charities, and even ministries to speak things and advertise things that totally go against who they are and what they believe."

Enforcement of the law, says Dacus, would be akin to the government requiring a Ford dealer to tell people they don't sell Chevrolets – then tell them the location of the Chevy dealerships and where they could get the best prices.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Do you depend on the network news to keep up with events of the day?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Fury over Beirut blast fuels protests, clashes with police
Trump allows some unemployment pay, defers payroll tax
Oregon trooper injured, 24 arrested in Portland protests
Is France helping Lebanon, or trying to reconquer it?
At least 8 soldiers dead in blast outside Somali army base
Survivors of deadly India crash say plane swayed violently

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Opinion — Andrew McCarthy: Should Judge Sullivan be disqualified from Michel Flynn case?
Nashville councilwoman wants attempted murder charges for people who don't wear face mask, pass on COVID-19
Amber Guyger, former Dallas cop, files appeal to get murder conviction overturned
Joe Biden apologizes for his insulting comments about the black community
Trump working on health insurance order on preexisting conditions

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Split court ruling favors unions - for now

lawsuit gavel with moneyLabor unions are celebrating a win at the U.S. Supreme Court but the teachers who lost the case may get another chance in the future.