First Amendment trumps Lynching of free speech

Tuesday, December 8, 2015
Chad Groening, Charlie Butts, Billy Davis (

Loretta Lynch US Attorney GeneralA former U.S. Justice Department attorney says the Left is proving why the First Amendment trumps the power of the federal government.

"If I want to go on national television and say things about Muslims that edge toward violence," says J. Christian Adams, "I have every right to do so under the First Amendment."

Adams is responding to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who told a gathering of Muslims that she fears anti-Muslim "rhetoric" after the Dec. 2 San Bernardino  attacks by a Muslim husband and wife. Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik killed 14 people and wounded 21 others. 

Lynch told the Muslim Advocates dinner that America is "based on free speech," but when that speech "edges toward violence," the Department of Justice "will take action."

As U.S. attorney general, Lynch is the most powerful law enforcement official in the country, and media reports suggest she was referring to "hateful speech" from a "screen," likely referring to computers via the Internet.

But the true legal test, Adams tells OneNewsNow, is "whether something is an imminent and real threat of violence, not something that edges toward it."

Lynch's suggestion, he says, is what our country's Founders feared.

'It's Islam stupid!' sign"It's why we have a First Amendment," Adams, a former DOJ whistleblower, says.

"Free speech protects speech with which you disagree," comments Liberty Counsel attorney Matt Staver. "And there is no exception for Islam or no exception for Mohammad."

Staver questions if Lynch and the Department of Justice would be willing to prosecute someone who claims the Koran calls for violent attacks against infidels and forced conversion to Islam.

To say such a statement is "hate speech" is wrong and irresponsible, says Staver, who suspects the attorney general's most likely motive is to chill free speech.

Days after speaking to the Muslim group, news website Politico reported that Lynch "recalibrated" those remarks and claimed the Department of Justice prosecutes "deeds and not words." 

Even though Lynch has said she's fearful of anti-Muslim backlash after the San Bernardino massacre, Politico says the attorney general has also said she's "unsure" what motivated the husband and wife to gun down his co-workers.

The Department of Justice, she said, is "not prepared to limit any particular ideology to what may have inspired these individuals." 


We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details







South digs out from Zeta's wrath
Trump praised for doing his best to help coal miners
  Texas early voting exceeds total of all 2016 ballots
  Alabama county plans fence to protect Confederate monument
  Quake kills 6 in western Turkey, rattles Greek island


Government threatens prosecution of 'hate speech' in homes
Duke and UNC accused of racism for tweeting about school history
Twelve steps to white recovery
These 12 graphs show mask mandates do nothing to stop COVID
Win or lose, Dems have big plans for America


Cartoon of the Day
It's a cross - so it's gotta go!

no crossAttorneys are confident a challenge to a Maryland memorial to military veterans will stand up to legal precedent on appeal.