School-choice setback in Colorado

Friday, July 3, 2015
 | 
Bob Kellogg (OneNewsNow.com)

Opponents of school choice in Colorado – who have been suing Douglas County's taxpayer scholarship program for years – were finally handed a victory this week by the state's Supreme Court.

In 2002 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it's permissible under the U.S. Constitution to include faith-based schools in school-choice programs. But on Monday, a divided Colorado Supreme Court ruled Douglas County's program unconstitutional stating, in part, that "a school district may not aid religious schools."

Michael Bindas, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, was surprised by that decision. "The Colorado Supreme Court reversed that [Supreme Court] decision in a very poorly reasoned opinion that ... in resolving this state constitutional question actually creates new federal constitutional problems," he tells OneNewsNow.

The Institute for Justice is consulting with the Douglas County School District, but Bindas is confident they will file an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court.

Bindas

"Ideally, the Supreme Court would make clear that a state cannot rely on its own constitution to single out and exclude religious options from educational aid programs the way Colorado did," he explains.

The attorney adds that if the court takes up that issue – "and answers it properly" – it would be "a hugely significant case that will have binding precedential effect" across the U.S.

In the meantime, school officials say they are moving ahead with a modified voucher program. Mark Silverstein of the ACLU of Colorado says his organization will challenge that as well.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Who deserves the blame for Trump having to declare a national emergency at the southern border?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Gunman kills 5 people, wounds 5 police at Illinois business
  California may sue Trump over emergency wall declaration
  ICE halts force-feeding of immigrant detainees in Texas
  Kaepernick, Eric Reid settle collusion grievances with NFL
  Academy reverses plans, will air all awards live at Oscars
Trump declares emergency to build border wall
Kentucky closer to banning most abortions if Roe overturned
Judge halts Air Force's efforts to discharge airmen with HIV

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Breaking: Democrats already using congressional power against Trump's emergency declaration
Mueller claims to have evidence Roger Stone communicated with WikiLeaks
Rush Limbaugh: Dem attacks were to cover their own misdeeds
How Virginia shields university presidents from public oversight
Those demanding reparations are silent on today's slave trade

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
ADF hopes for 'clarity' from high court

Four Oklahoma Christian universities, along with a growing number of other plaintiffs, have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court for relief from the Obama administration's contraceptive mandate.