Lawsuit seeks to impose 'gay marriage' on Tenn.

Monday, November 4, 2013
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Four same-gender couples and their lawyers have brought suit in Tennessee in an attempt to force the state to recognize their "marriages" and invalidate a constitutional marriage amendment approved by more than 80 percent of voters.

By a huge margin, Tennessee's constitution was amended in 2006 to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman to thwart against challenges by homosexuals. Emboldened by recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, the homosexual couples filed suit in federal court last month to overturn the amendment.

Those couples, which are being represented by the National Center for Lesbian Rights, moved to Tennessee following their "marriages" in California and New York. Among the couples are two female college teachers and a full-time Army reservist and his "husband." All four couples moved to Tennessee within the last three years.

Fowler

David Fowler of the Family Action Council of Tennessee is personally outraged that the couples are asking the court to force the state to recognize their out-of-state marriages.

"Essentially we have people who, deciding where they want to live and all the other factors that go into that, decided to move to a state they know does not recognize the marriage they entered into in California and New York," he tells OneNewsNow. "And they're essentially asking the court to impose upon the people of Tennessee their definition of marriage."

Eighty-one percent of Tennessee voters approved the constitutional amendment – a fact that Fowler says makes the case an issue of states' rights.

"It's [also] an issue of federalism and it's an issue of the people being able to control their own marital and domestic policy, which the Supreme Court this summer acknowledged was inherently and historically a matter left up to the states," he argues. "California and New York are free to have the definition of marriage they want, but the people of Tennessee should have the definition of marriage they want."

Fowler also points out that homosexual men and women have an option of moving to a state that does recognize same-gender marriage.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Could high school graduates in your state pass the same history/civics exam required of naturalized citizens?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump softens demand for border wall downpayment
San Diego school district introduces Islam propaganda program
Texas court serves as model for Trump's approach to illegals
  Swedish court convicts 3 Afghan men of Facebook rape
O'Reilly surprised by Fox exit, says truth will come out

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Obama's hidden Iran deal giveaway
Homeschoolers face prison in Obama's island 'paradise'
Snowflake hypocrisy: Wisconsin students say Muslims can opt out of business, but not Christians
Illegals thwart immigration laws with help from lawyers, judges, educators
Oxford University: Avoiding eye contact is racist

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Eliminating tax-free housing benefit for pastors would hurt small churches

Pastors need not be concerned in the short run about a decision declaring their housing allowance unconstitutional – that's the advice from the founder of Liberty Counsel.