Pro-life laws' defeat 'doesn't make sense'

Friday, December 7, 2012
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Two Oklahoma pro-life laws might be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court, now that the state's high court has struck both of them down.

The first measure, which passed in 2010, requires that a woman be shown an ultrasound of her baby before she has an abortion. The second, approved in 2011, requires that abortionists follow the FDA protocol in administering abortion drugs like RU-486.

Balch, Mary Spaulding (NRLC)Mary Spaulding Balch of the National Right to Life Committee explains that the Oklahoma court based its decisions on a Supreme Court case titled Pennsylvania v. Casey. In separate decisions, the Oklahoma Supreme Court said the laws, which received wide bipartisan support in the legislature, violated that 1992 Supreme Court case.

"I think they're correct to say that they are bound by the federal law," she notes, "and the United States Supreme Court has said in Casey that the states have the right to regulate abortion. Most particularly, Casey was about informed consent and accurate information."

The ultrasound provides truthful information to the mother -- that what she is considering aborting is a child. So Balch does not think the Oklahoma ruling makes sense.

The second law, which simply says that chemical abortions have to follow federal guidelines, was also struck down.

"When the Supreme Court says that it violates federal law, it doesn't make sense, because they were trying to do that very thing -- to follow the federal law," the pro-lifer reasons.

Balch hopes the Oklahoma attorney general will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, and she believes there is a good chance of winning if the court will hear the case.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Should vaccination of children be decided by parents/guardians – or by government regulations?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Directors guild files disciplinary charges against Weinstein
Japan votes for lower house; Abe's party seen headed for win
5 former presidents appear together for hurricane relief
No. 1 Alabama routs struggling rival Tennessee, 45-7
54 Egyptian police killed in ambush, say officials
Trump jabs back at 'wacky' congresswoman as spat rolls on
Foreigners who joined IS faced almost certain death in Raqqa

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Property-rights advocates to Trump: Restore Americans' land rights
Trump announces release of long-awaited JFK files
Why should we care about crackpot professors?
Rachel Maddow called out by fellow liberals for pushing anti-Trump conspiracy
Trump says he intends to allow release of classified files on Kennedy assassination

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Mandate challenge left up to lower courts

Though the Supreme Court has declined to intervene, Hobby Lobby will continue its fight against the Health and Human Services mandate that it provide free insurance coverage for abortion-causing drugs.