Future of Supreme Court depends on November election

Tuesday, October 23, 2012
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

The makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court isn't decided by voters, but by the president and Senate. A constitutional expert believes that should be a crucial issue for voters when they go to the polls November 6.

Mat Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel and Liberty Counsel Action, points to a recent ruling by the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declaring part of the federal law defining marriage as being between one man and one woman is unconstitutional.

He stresses the next president will have the opportunity to select at least one and perhaps two justices to the nation's high court.

Staver, Mat (Liberty Counsel)"We already know where President Obama stands on this issue," he remarks. "We already know he will use a litmus test in appointing justices and judges who are judicial activists who would use their position to undermine the definition of marriage and to promote an immoral kind of jurisprudence."

According to Staver, if only one liberal, activist judge is appointed the balance of the court would change.

"We will lose the Supreme Court literally for the rest of our lives regarding social issues," he says. "It will be a machine that will simply undermine our social values, and that's why I think this election is so critically important."

Read related commentary by attorney Matt Barber 

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Could high school graduates in your state pass the same history/civics exam required of naturalized citizens?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump softens demand for border wall downpayment
San Diego school district introduces Islam propaganda program
Texas court serves as model for Trump's approach to illegals
  Swedish court convicts 3 Afghan men of Facebook rape
O'Reilly surprised by Fox exit, says truth will come out

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Obama's hidden Iran deal giveaway
Homeschoolers face prison in Obama's island 'paradise'
Snowflake hypocrisy: Wisconsin students say Muslims can opt out of business, but not Christians
Illegals thwart immigration laws with help from lawyers, judges, educators
Oxford University: Avoiding eye contact is racist

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
38th case filed against HHS mandate

Indiana-based Grote Industries is the latest to file suit against the ObamaCare mandate.