A rollback to 'race neutral' while court fights loom

Wednesday, July 11, 2018
 | 
Bob Kellogg (OneNewsNow.com)

high school graduationAn organization of black conservatives is praising the Trump administration for taking a race-neutral stance on college admissions.

"I believe President Trump is wise to rescind the aggressive Obama-era affirmative action directive for the use of race in ethnicity and student admissions," says longtime educator Dr. Carol Swain, who is also a spokeswoman for Project 21.

In a joint statement, the Dept. of Education and Dept. of Justice announced July 3 they were rescinding the Obama-era policy guidelines that "circumvent Congress and the courts" by creating guidance that goes beyond current federal laws, The New York Times unhappily reported.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said in a statement that the U.S. Supreme Court has determined what policies are constitutional – and its decisions are the best guide over the issue.

Swain

The story recalled that the Obama administration issued "policy guidance" in 2011 that claimed the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled there are "compelling interests" to achieve diversity in college admissions, and in elementary and secondary schools.

In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a U.S. Court of Appeals decision in Fisher v. University of Texas, which found that affirmative-action measures are acceptable for the goal of diversity. Abigail Noel Fischer was denied admission to the school in 2008 and sued, claiming she was turned down because her race, white, was considered along with grades and leadership experience.

Cooper

Referring to legal fights over raced-based admissions, Project 21 spokesman Horace Cooper says the Supreme Court has never ruled that affirmative action should be a "generic remediation tool for all past racial injustice."

Swain, a former professor at Vanderbilt University, says the Obama-era guidelines resulted in "blatant discrimination" against "non-protected races," including Asians seeking admittance. 

A legal battle is under way at Harvard, in fact, where the prestigious university has admitted it excluded Asian-American student applicants to maintain those slots for other preferred races. Those excluded students have sued and legal analysts expect that case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What are two major benefits of tough border laws in the U.S.?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Latest: 300 mourn victims outside tourism boat business
White House rejects Putin idea for Ukraine referendum
Director James Gunn fired from 'Guardians 3' over old tweets
Bayer to stop sales of birth control device tied to injuries
Death toll climbs to 17 in Missouri boating tragedy
Iowa tornadoes hit unexpectedly, causing damage and injuries
Republicans pick Charlotte to host 2020 convention

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Missouri duck boat survivor claims captain told passengers they wouldn't 'need' life jackets, report says
Lisa Page confirms Strzok thought Russia probe meritless
After leak, Miami Dolphins owner denies having plan to suspend national anthem protesters
John Brennan, Obama's CIA director, admits egging on the FBI's probe of Trump and Russia
'Hand Trump' t-shirts peddled on Facebook

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Va. Tech prof: Burning gas is 'petro-masculinity'

climate change CO2A vitriolic ultra-left Virginia Tech professor wrote an article that was so bizarre – even by progressive standards – that the conservative political blog Powerline chose it for the "Green Weenie of the Week."