Mixed review on Trump's education budget

Tuesday, March 6, 2018
 | 
Bob Kellogg (OneNewsNow.com)

Teacher's deskConcern is being expressed over a segment of the president's proposed education budget that would mean one billion dollars for private school choice.

The Trump administration is proposing a cut of just over five percent for the Department of Education. At the same time, the administration wants to allocate around one billion dollars for private school choice – something Neal McCluskey of the Cato Institute argues isn't a good thing.

"For one thing, the federal government and federal policymakers are too far removed from individual families, certainly, and from communities to know what is best for those families and communities," he explains to OneNewsNow.

In other words, as he writes: "$1 billion applicable to private school choice ... would threaten centralized regulation of choice, rendering such choice far less meaningful."

Even though taxpayers may like to hear about proposed budget cuts, McCluskey – associate director of Cato's Center for Educational Freedom – says school officials become apoplectic at the thought of reduced federal funds.

McCluskey, Neal (Cato Institute)"And anytime we do see [budget cuts], of course – as has happened here – it's greeted with wailing and gnashing of teeth, especially from people who are benefitting directly from the money," he warns'

And that, he points out, typically isn't students or families. "[It] is the people who run programs or who run schools [who benefit]."

McCluskey points out that Trump's suggestion to cut funding for the DOE is very unlikely to happen, especially since this is an election year.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Would you prefer that Attorney General Jeff Sessions uphold the laws of the United States – or the laws of the United Methodist Church?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump tells GOP to 'stop wasting their time' on immigration
Supreme Court adopts new rules for cellphone tracking
UK split by Brexit divide 2 years after vote to leave EU
Another U.S. worker confirmed hurt by mystery Cuba incidents
2 Koreas meet to arrange reunions of war-split families
Charles Krauthammer, prominent conservative voice, has died
Many Egyptian Christians feel left out of World Cup
Bank robbery suspect gives ID, easily tracked by police

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Women-only tech scholarships, ‘Man Tax’ violate California discrimination laws: lawsuit
Boy, 13, charged with felony for recording meeting with principal
Open letter to school boards everywhere: Stop renaming your schools after Obama
Another massive media screw up: Viral photo used to prove family separation horror was of a girl who wasn't actually separated
When PC comes back to bite you

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Legislative objective: Retain, relief for military families

Children readingA proposal now before Congress would enhance the educational opportunities for children in military families as well as contribute to the retention of qualified soldiers.