Another warning about 'red flag' laws versus Constitution

Monday, August 12, 2019
Chris Woodward (

Police raidPresident Donald Trump and Congress appear to be on the same political page over so-called “red flag” laws but a medical doctor and 2nd Amendment supporter is throwing up red flags of his own.

"I think the idea of trying to keep guns away from people who may be dangerous with them is very important," says Dr. Robert Young, executive editor of Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership (DRGW). "But there is no red flag law now, or as proposed, that does that in any constitutional way, ensuring proper due process to the subjects of these orders."

“Red flag” laws allow law enforcement to confiscate firearms if a person is found to be mentally unstable, or a danger to others, and Americans in 17 states are currently under such controversial laws.

In the U.S. Senate, Republican Lindsey Graham is working with Sen. Richard Blumenthal to introduce red flag legislation in the Senate Judiciary Committee that creates a federal grant program.

"Mental illness and hatred pulls the trigger, not the gun," the President said during a White House address last week. "That is why I have called for red flag laws."

According to Young, despite the good intentions of the laws, it boils down to a person being discussed in court without being told of the hearing and therefore having no legal right to defend themselves.

“And the first they hear about it,” Young complains, “is when the police knock on their door.”

Abraham Hamilton III, general counsel for the American Family Association, and a former prosecutor, made much the same argument last week, suggesting that “red flag” laws violate numerous constitutional rights.

The website for DRGO includes a page about “protective orders” and states the rights of the individual must be protected or else a “red flag” law violates the 4th Amendment,  5th Amendment, 6th Amendment, and 14th Amendment.

Young, a psychiatrist, says it has been claimed that “red flag” laws have saved people’s lives.

“I have not seen any data that argues that,” he says. “I just hear claims."

Editor's Note: The American Family Association is the parent organization of the American Family News Network, which operates


We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details




What do you believe will have the greatest influence with Jewish voters in November 2020?





Iranian oil tanker pursued by US says it is going to Turkey
75 years later, US World War II veterans say: Never forget
Supreme Court: Ginsburg treated for tumor on pancreas
Trump raises tariffs on Chinese goods as trade war escalates
'Our bigger enemy': Trump escalates attack on Fed chief
US stocks tumble as US-China trade war rattles investors
Christian printer argues right to reject homosexual business


Christian deputy’s request to follow ‘Billy Graham Rule’ got him fired, he claims in lawsuit
Florida gun owner who claimed self-defense convicted in 'Stand Your Ground' case
Texas man licks ice cream, puts it back on grocery shelf — and really regrets the consequences
Jeffrey Epstein taken off suicide watch after examination by 'doctoral-level psychologist,' DOJ says
NYPD says attack against 58-year-old might be an anti-white hate crime


Cartoon of the Day
Rep.: Tlaib's, Omar's Islamic hate for Israel spreading in party

Muslim Congresswomen Omar and TlaibDemocratic leaders continue to jump to the defense of two Islamic congresswomen as they repeatedly accuse Israel and Jews for everything from oppressing Palestinians to manipulating politics and the mainstream media. One of their fellow House members, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), contends the entire Democratic Party is becoming more and more anti-Semitic and anti-Israel.