Voters force referendum on dangerous pro-LGBT bathroom law

Friday, August 17, 2018
Chris Woodward (

transgender bathroom 'we don't care'If you live in Massachusetts, the midterm elections aren't the only thing to keep an eye on this fall.

In addition to determining Senate, House, and gubernatorial races, voters in The Bay State will decide in November whether to overturn a 2016 law allowing people to use bathrooms and locker rooms for the gender with which they say they identify. Andrew Beckwith, president of Massachusetts Family Institute, says the law puts women and children at risk of sexual predators who take advantage of the policy.

Pointing to a nationwide study this year by the group Woman Means Something, Beckwith says incidents in Target stores are all the more reason for repeal.


"A couple of years ago, Target very publicly changed their store policy across the country to say if you feel like a woman, you can use the women's restroom or changing room," he explains. "The study looked at the incidents of voyeurism or up-skirting or illegal photographing that happened in Target stores, and what they found is there was a real uptick after that policy was announced."

According to researchers, which looked at the numbers before and after the policy was announced, there was a two-fold increase of voyeurism and up-skirting.

A voter referendum on the law this fall was made possible after an organization known as Keep MA Safe gathered more than 50,000 signatures in 45 days. Massachusetts Family Institute participated in the effort.

"We did it primarily with volunteers going out and explaining the situation and getting signatures," Beckwith shares, adding that when people learn what the law actually does, they're ready to vote for repeal. He explains:

"[Under this law] the definition of 'gender identity' doesn't require surgery or hormones or a doctor's notice," he says. "[It's] just based purely on how one feels on the inside. It doesn't even have to be consistently held – someone could be a man all day until he decides he's a woman right before walking into a women's bathroom."

And according to Beckwith, if anyone tries to oppose or stop that person from going into the bathroom they want to go into, they can be sued for up to $50,000 or face a year in jail as a civil rights violation.

"Prayer is very important in a situation like this, because we are going to be radically out-funded," he concludes. "The media is very much on the side of keeping this law in place, regardless of its impact on privacy and safety."


We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details





After two days of testimony in the impeachment inquiry, I am …





Iran supreme leader warns ‘thugs’ amid gas price protests
US, S Korea postpone joint exercise criticized by N Korea
White House urgently ramps up push for drug cost legislation
Democrat Edwards reelected governor of Louisiana
Alleged gunman, victim among 6 charged after game shooting
Parents, 3 sons die in apparent murder-suicide in San Diego
American held in Turkey as IS suspect returns to US
Sandy Hook lawsuit could force Remington to open books


Hong Kong police officer shot with arrow, protesters set fires as Chinese troops appear to clean streets
Elise Stefanik emerges as main Schiff antagonist in fiery impeachment hearings
Nearly 80,000 immigrants approved for DACA have arrest records, USCIS report finds
Study confirms media coverage of Trump is 'more hostile than normal' and ignores good economic news
White House budget official questioned in impeachment probe


Cartoon of the Day
Prayers answered, for now – 'Must Stay Gay' bill shelved

counseling therapy sessionA homosexual legislator in California is being applauded for pulling his controversial bill that would have made it illegal to offer resources or engage in efforts aimed at changing an individual's unwanted same-sex attractions.