Can 1st Amendment defeat faith-based counseling ban?

Thursday, June 28, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Bill of RightsMassachusetts lawmakers have approved a bill banning faith-based counseling for children struggling with unwanted same-sex attraction but a conservative activist predicts the law might not survive a legal challenge.

Known by its critics at Massachusetts Family Institute as the "counseling ban," the state House of Representatives passed House Bill 4014 by an overwhelming vote of 137 to 14.

The bill follows a similar pattern in other states, where homosexual activists label such counseling "conversion therapy" and demonize it as dangerous and unhealthy for children.

Defenders of the professional counseling maintain that children who have been sexually abused, guided by their concerned parents, should have the legal right to seek the professional help they want.  

"This is a disappointment but not a surprise given how powerful the LGBTQ lobby is on Beacon Hill," responds Andrew Beckwith, president of Massachusetts Family Institute.

"The good news," he adds, "is that the section of the bill that labeled biblical counseling on issues of human sexuality as 'child abuse' was dropped at the last minute."

Despite the lopsided vote in the House, Beckwith credits supporters of Massachusetts Family Institute for sharing their concerns with lawmakers.

Beckwith

The bill, however, still prohibits therapists from counseling children and their families, and MFI is now working with Liberty Counsel and Alliance Defending Freedom to challenge the bill.

Pointing to this week's Supreme Court decision in NIFLA v. Becerra, Beckwith says that ruling undermines the legal basis upon which the authors of the counseling ban relied. 

"This means that it is likely," he predicts, "the legislation will eventually be struck down as an unconstitutional state restriction on the free speech of mental health professionals."

With Justice Anthony Kennedy retiring this summer, Beckwith also predicts a solid five-vote majority supporting freedom of speech if the case reaches the high court.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why is ‘drag queen story hour’ being defended even after convicted sex offenders participated? (Choose up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump vows response to China tariff threat
  Special prosecutor named to look into Jussie Smollett case
  DOJ: Immigration jail shouldn't have to pay minimum wage
  ACLU forces school district to adopt leftist ideology
  Danish leader speaks with Trump amid Greenland dispute
Democrats pessimistic about "Medicare for All' plan
US officials confirm Israeli strike in Iraq

LATEST FROM THE WEB

How 'bout 'National Family Month'? Ideas for 2020
'I AM NOT SUICIDAL,' says man who exposed Hillary's ties to Google
Todd Starnes: Beauty queen in combat boots takes on Trump Derangement Syndrome
Why victimhood and fear won’t preserve liberty
Good grief: University banned beef because a fashion expert declared a ‘climate emergency’

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Police report another 'trans policy' incident at Target store

Target signIt's happened again: a man has taken advantage of a major retailer's policy on bathroom and changing room use that a pro-family group argues threatens the safety of women and children.