WV pastor: Let's have debate, Facebook, over 'hate'

Friday, January 12, 2018
 | 
Steve Jordahl (OneNewsNow.com)

Love winsThe pastor of a West Virginia-based ministry that uses Facebook as a preaching platform says the Internet giant is censoring his so-called "hate speech" while personal threats go ignored.

"I get banned all the time," Rich Penkoski (pictured below) complains to OneNewsNow. "If I post anything with the acronym LGBT in it, regardless of what it's about, it gets reported and I get banned for 30 days."

The ministry's ongoing feud with Facebook, and the threats and antics it has endured from the Left, can be read here.

Penkoski's complaints got picked up by CBN News, which reports in a Jan. 9 story that the "Warriors for Christ" ministry has more than 225,000 followers on its Facebook page.

Warriors for Christ screen stillThe news story recalled that Penkoski's ongoing dispute with homosexual activists grew so dangerous to his safety over the summer that law enforcement authorities advised him to move his family.

Penkoski says he personally knows what constitutes "hate speech," because he receives it constantly. "Telling somebody that they should go kill themselves, that they don't deserve to live," he complains.

Yet such comments somehow don't violate Facebook's community standards policy.  

Facebook like buttonFacebook, meanwhile, pulled a live "Warriors for Christ" feed earlier this week.

"We don't call them any names. We don't use any derogatory terms to describe people," Penkoski insists, referring to his preaching against homosexuality. "We don't wish harm on anyone, ever."

The pastor's feud with Facebook mirrors the lawsuit filed in California by radio host Dennis Prager and his company, PragerU. The complaint claims Youtube and Google have restricted or demonetized more than 50 online videos due to their conservative content. 

Regarding yet another social media platform, James O'Keefe and his Project Veritas published undercover videos this week in which Twitter employees openly admit that "shadow banning" is used to hide content from a person's own Twitter followers. Twitter engineers are also trying to create software to "down rank" users the company considers controversial.

Attorneys for Lila Rose's pro-life group Live Action complained in October that Twitter had banned ads from the group.

In order to advertise, Twitter said, Live Action must drop "sensitive content" from its own website, referring to undercover investigations and images of abortion procedures.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why is ‘drag queen story hour’ being defended even after convicted sex offenders participated? (Choose up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump vows response to China tariff threat
  Special prosecutor named to look into Jussie Smollett case
  DOJ: Immigration jail shouldn't have to pay minimum wage
  ACLU forces school district to adopt leftist ideology
  Danish leader speaks with Trump amid Greenland dispute
Democrats pessimistic about "Medicare for All' plan
US officials confirm Israeli strike in Iraq

LATEST FROM THE WEB

How 'bout 'National Family Month'? Ideas for 2020
'I AM NOT SUICIDAL,' says man who exposed Hillary's ties to Google
Todd Starnes: Beauty queen in combat boots takes on Trump Derangement Syndrome
Why victimhood and fear won’t preserve liberty
Good grief: University banned beef because a fashion expert declared a ‘climate emergency’

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Half-billion-dollar Obama library deemed a waste

Obama lectures about OrlandoBarack Obama’s presidential library slated to be built in The Windy City is being slammed by Chicagoans as a frivolous use of tax dollars – especially after the announcement that an additional $100 million will be needed to renovate city park land to accommodate it.