AFA not OK with FADA

Monday, August 1, 2016
Charlie Butts, Billy Davis (

Freedom of Religion buttonA proposed law meant to protect people of faith from homosexual activism is losing support from some pro-family groups.

Republicans in Congress have introduced the First Amendment Defense Act, which protects Americans who hold now-politically incorrect views about homosexuality and marriage after the U.S. Supreme Court's controversial Obergefell decision last year.

The American Family Association is among the groups that have stepped back from FADA, citing language in a proposed amendment to bill.

AFA spokesman Abraham Hamilton III, an attorney for the Tupelo, Mississippi-based ministry, says that language would legally recognize unnatural marriage.

The original bill language states:

The Federal Government shall not take any discriminatory action against a person, wholly or partially on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or that sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

natural marriage

With new language for homosexuals added at the end, the amended language reads:

The Federal Government shall not take any discriminatory action against a person, wholly or partially on the basis that such person believes, speaks, or acts in accordance with a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of two individuals of the opposite sex; or two individuals of the same sex; or extramarital relations are improper.

It's the reference to "two individuals of the same sex" that has upset groups that would normally back such legislation.

"There are some who are afraid of having biblical marriage rejected through our court system," Hamilton says, "but we cannot stand by, in an effort to elevate pragmatism, [and] allow biblical marriage to be undermined in any way, shape or form."

For that reason, he says, AFA, Liberty Counsel and Family Research Council have publicly withdrawn support.

Homo flag in front of SC (Newer version)Writing for National Review Online, conservative author Maggie Gallagher acknowledged the new language makes the bill "viewpoint neutral," meaning the intent is to prevent the federal government from punishing people for views on marriage that are either liberal or conservative.

She went on to urge FRC and other groups to support the bill anyway, explaining that it's the only way conservative views will be protected by law.


"I do not know of any Republicans who plan to try to take away the tax-exempt status of the Human Rights Campaign," Gallagher wrote. "But the hearing showed very clearly that there are Democrats thinking about whether they can do that to groups such as the Family Research Council."

According to Hamilton, AFA is asking Congress to drop the amendment he says "subverts" the bill's original purpose and to revert to the original language.

Editor's Note: The American Family Association is the parent organization of the American Family News Network, which operates


We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details





What's the most likely result if Democrats' plan for impeachment fails?





US and Turkey have friendly talks but differences persist
As rockets rain down, Israel intensifies its strikes in Gaza
Overdoses possible in some student deaths on USC campus
Bishop who investigated sex abuse accused of sex abuse
Astros' Verlander, Mets' deGrom win 2nd Cy Young Awards
Democrats' key witness grilled about Trump’s hold on Ukraine aid
Arctic blast spreads shivers from Maine to Deep South


Trump vows new Ukraine transcript release in post-impeachment hearing press conference
Republicans denounce 'hearsay' testimony on first day of Trump impeachment hearings
Disney Plus streaming platform includes trigger warnings for 'Pinocchio,' 'Lady and the Tramp,' and more. The warning is for 'outdated cultural depictions.'
Kellogg partnered with LGBTQ group for 'All Together' cereal, but consumers weren't happy
Hillary Clinton says 'many, many, many people' want her to join 2020 Democratic primary


Cartoon of the Day
Inflicting a leftist 'moral imperative' on America

polygamy illustrationA Christian worldview expert says liberal media outlets and left-leaning politicians are pulling out all the stops in their quest to impose their subjective agendas on the culture – all the while arguing it's their moral imperative to do so.