Indiana's 'tug of war' over religious freedom

Friday, January 29, 2016
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Bible study groupReligious freedom may continue to have limited protections as lawmakers in Indiana consider special protections for homosexuals.

Senate Bill 344 has passed out of committee and will go to the full Senate for a vote. The legislation would add sexual orientation as a special protected class. Joshua Denton of the Indiana Family Institute tells OneNewsNow neither side of the debate is happy with the measure.

"It's a dangerous thing to go down [this path] whenever you are elevating sexual behavior or elevating that to a protected status at the cost of religious freedom, obviously," Denton states. "A lot of religious conservatives dislike it."

As do homosexual activists, who complain it doesn't go far enough – including the fact that it doesn't include protections for the transgendered who have a mental condition called "gender dysphoria" that lends itself well to counseling.

Denton

According to Denton, people of faith are at risk if the bill passes.

"In many applications, Senate Bill 344 will violate the free exercise of religion and free-speech guarantees of both the United States and Indiana constitutions," he explains. "The state will have to defend against those legal challenges" – an effort he argues would be costly and time-consuming for the state as well as for small businesses that cannot afford to fight against discrimination lawsuits.

Another bill (Senate Bill 66) was submitted to provide strengthened protections for religious liberty, but it failed to emerge from committee by one vote. It would have repealed last year's "fix" to the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). Denton says the demise of S.B. 66 was expected.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What do you think of some Democrats' proposal to do away with U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Dozens dead or hurt in wedding party blast in Afghan capital
Arrests and shields, metal poles seized at Portland protests
New York City subway scare suspect taken into police custody
Hong Kong’s divide: 1 protest for democracy, 1 for China
Signs of recession worry Trump ahead of 2020
Kim expresses 'great satisfaction' over NKorea weapons tests
Google employees call for pledge not to work with ICE

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Leaked transcripts reveal how NY Times leadership plans to craft Trump-racism narrative
Suspect accused of shooting 6 Philadelphia cops during standoff charged with attempted murder
White House to proceed with ending some foreign aid payments
Opinion - Matthew Brodsky: Tlaib, Omar don’t deserve sympathy for being barred from Israel – They deserve condemnation
Joe Biden confuses Burlington, Iowa, with Burlington, Vt., in latest gaffe

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
76 percent say living together before marriage OK

An overwhelming majority of young American couples now believe that it is not morally wrong to live together before marriage.