Seattle set to run out of money but keep homeless

Thursday, May 17, 2018
Chris Woodward (

Amazon logoTwo powerful companies failed to stop a new tax in liberal Seattle, a city that can't get enough taxes to waste according to an economist.

Mega-corporations Amazon and Starbucks watched this week as the far-left Seattle City Council voted 9-0 for a new tax that affects the two biggest employers in the city.

Amazon, in fact, is currently expanding beyond its 45,000 employees and plans to add 7,000 more employees and build a new skyscraper. Those plans, however, made be put on hold, the company has announced. 

"Seattle is a tax-to-the-max jurisdiction," observes economist Paul Guppy of the Washington Policy Center, responding to the city council's "head tax" on companies making at least $20 million in gross revenues.

Starbucks signThe city council plans to use the new tax revenue to help fund affordable housing and address homelessness in Seattle, which is among the most expensive places in the country to live.

Seattle also has one of the highest rates of homelessness in the nation.

An original plan to add a $520 tax per employee was scaled back to $275, which was seen as a compromise by city leaders.

Political blog Hot Air noted that Amazon's threat to end its expansion plans was described as "blackmail" by one city council member, and a labor group claimed Amazon was committing a crime and demanded an investigation. 

Amazon has suggested the city's coffers have grown in recent years and Starbucks, meanwhile, is suggesting the city has a spending problem.

"This City pays more attention to the desires of the owners of illegally parked RVs than families seeking emergency shelter," a spokesman for Starbucks told in a statement. 

Jonathan Williams, speaking for the American Legislative Exchange Council, tells OneNewsNow that Seattle is about to learn that even liberal, left-leaning companies will "vote with their feet" if they are forced to do so.

"Vote with their pocketbooks," he says, "like we've talked about for so many years, and go places with more economic opportunity." 

Guppy tells OneNewsNow that he doubts the City of Seattle will address homelessness despite a $200 million annual budget to do so. 

"The reason I say that," he says, "is the city has spent over a billion dollars on homeless programs over the years, and a program to end homelessness ended in failure."

This new source of revenue, he predicts, won't help it get any better.

Editor's Note: Comments by Jonathan Williams have been added to this story. 

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.



We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details




What does Pinterest's banning of a pro-life group tell you about that social media platform?





Trump threatens to deport millions of illegals beginning next week
New York state OKs licenses for illegals
US sending troops to Mideast amid Gulf tensions over Iran
  Survey shows continued decline in giving to religious groups
Facebook plans its own currency for 2 billion-plus users
  Virginia Dems refuse hearing for sexual assault allegations


Driver's license trick to result in seizing your guns?
Campus food service worker hit with bias complaint after saying ‘hello’ to student in Japanese
TUCKER CARLSON: How libs turned California into disgusting pit of poverty
Did your child return from college a better person?
Harvard demonstrates once again that post-Christian America is post-forgiveness America


Cartoon of the Day
Coffee chain trying to have it both ways

Starbucks signStarbucks is opening its bathrooms to everyone regardless of whether they've bought anything, and one organization thinks this new policy could come back to haunt the business.