FYI: Most union members didn't choose their union

Thursday, December 7, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

labor unions (illustration)A case before the Supreme Court next year has big implications for public sector workers and union fees – and that's only half the story.

In 2018, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 31. Mark Janus, an employee at the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Service claims that paying union fees, which are a condition of his employment, force him to speak through his union in ways that violate his First Amendment rights.

If Janus prevails, he and other public-sector workers will be able to choose whether to pay union dues or fees without threat of being fired.

"Even if Mr. Janus wins in court, public sector union members will still have no say regarding which union represents their bargaining unit," says Robert Alt, president and CEO of the Ohio-based Buckeye Institute.

Alt

How so?

"Most Americans are probably unaware of the fact that 94 percent of union workers in this country have never had the opportunity to vote for the union that's representing them," he responds. "This is a result of the process by which the unions are elected to represent bargaining units. They tend to be sort of 'one-and-done' elections by which they get elected and never have to stand for re-election."

For example, Alt says in Columbus, Ohio, where he lives, the local teachers union was voted in as a representative of the bargaining unit back in the 1960s before many of current teachers were born.

"So he or she has never had the opportunity to actually vote for that union as their representative," Alt continues. "Fundamentally, I think most people can understand this just isn't fair. It deprives those workers of a voice and a choice with regard to their representation."

According to Alt, there is a remedy.

"The law allows states to enact worker voting rights, which provide for holding periodic elections for the unions that represent public sector workers – which is to say those workers that work for state or local government," he explains. "They could be public school teachers; they could be individuals who work for agencies ... and by doing this, this gives them a voice with regards to their representation."

Read Alt's article on this issue

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What’s the biggest lesson for the liberal media after ‘collusion’ claims have fallen apart?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Court: San Francisco can't be sued over illegal who killed Steinle
  Democrats fail to override Trump veto on border funding
Utah bans abortions after 18 weeks, teeing up legal showdown
US expands ban on foreign aid to overseas abortion providers
High court seems wary of involving judges in redistricting
Israel, Gaza terrorists in 2nd day of cross-border fighting

LATEST FROM THE WEB

U.S. kids: Allahu akbar, we are your soldiers
How to end abortion practically overnight
UC-Berkeley student government demands suspensions of officers who arrested black students
It's only Monday and Trump haters are already having a horrible week
Washington follies: The Mueller report

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Pay raises coming...and slashed hours, too?

cash 100-dollar billEighteen states will see an increase in their minimum wages on January 1 but the message for workers is to hold back their excitement.