Gates', Soros' green money is better than taxpayers'

Thursday, December 15, 2016
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Bill GatesHighly recognized names in the business world are putting big money behind energy efforts, but critics are wary of massive funding

The Breakthrough Energy Coalition, whose members include liberals such as Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson and George Soros, announced a $1 billion investment fund to support new energy ventures.

The coalition wants to magnify the speed and scale at which promising energy breakthroughs are introduced to the $6 trillion energy market.

Gates was eager to put major funding into the program in the name of environmentalism.
          
"Our goal is to build companies that will help deliver the next generation of reliable, affordable, and emissions-free energy to the world," Gates announced in a printed statement.

Institute for Energy Research (IER) Vice President for Communication Chris Warren told OneNewsNow OneNewsNow says that it is better for people from the private business sector to put money into such programs, rather than the federal government via taxpayer dollars.

"It's a nice break from what we typically see in this country, as far as energy technology, which is with the government subsidizing to deploy technologies like wind and solar," Warren expressed. "From what I call in this instance, it's these wealthy investors like Bill Gates putting their own money behind something because they perceive there to be a demand for it."

According to Warren, private funding for such endeavors is how things should operate.

"There may be something else to this story – maybe a public, private partnership, where taxpayer funds will go to some of this research – but essentially, what they're doing is putting their money towards something to invest and explore potential, emerging technologies," Warren continued.

Even though the energy expert believes that many of the billions of dollars that businessman are spending on renewable energy projects is throwing money into the wind, he says it is better that they sink their money into them than taxpayers.

"Now, do I necessarily agree with their perceived threat or need that they're trying to fill?” Warren asked before answering his own question. “Not necessarily, but I'd rather see their money on the line than taxpayer dollars."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What is the most likely scenario on Election Day?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Hearing on Kavanaugh allegations puts #MeToo to the test
Trump challenges UN, boasting of America's go-it-alone might
Mattis: Jury is out on women succeeding in combat jobs
Crack in beam shuts down San Francisco's new $2B terminal
Trump says Dems using 'con game' to sink Kavanaugh court bid
Bill Cosby gets 3 to 10 years in prison for sex assault
Minnesota Democratic chairman says Ellison probe wrapping up

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Breaking: Republicans schedule vote for Kavanaugh confirmation – and Democrats are outraged
Grassley says he 'is not going to silence' Ford, vows key Kavanaugh hearing will proceed before possible vote
Trump: Dems playing 'con game' with Kavanaugh
High school decides on gender-neutral homecoming
Mega-pastor: Ten Commandments no longer applicable

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Pros and cons of Uber and Lyft fingerprint checks in NYC

car dealership lotWith the coming of the New Year, fingerprint background checks could be required for Uber and Lyft in upstate New York, where arguments for and against the idea have been voiced.