'Scrubbers' muddy claim of 'dirty coal'

Monday, April 18, 2016
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

coal-powered plant in KY 620x300One of the biggest arguments against the coal industry involves how "dirty" coal is but one critic of that argument calls it a myth.

Sierra Club is one of the biggest critics of the coal industry, saying it contributes to everything from climate disruption – or climate change - to toxic water pollution and asthma. As a result, the club's Beyond Coal campaign has a countdown for the number of coal-burning power plants the Sierra Club wants to see retired.

On the other side of the argument is Terry Jarrett, attorney and former Missouri Public Service commissioner. He says the "myth" of dirty coal is, in fact, just a myth.

"We can all harken back to 30, 40 years ago," he says, "with the old-fashioned coal plants, so to speak, which were belching out a lot of smoke out of their smokestacks. And that is sort of what the green industry continues to try to portray coal as being."

But that is no longer true today, he insists, calling today's plants "very, very clean."

Sierra Club and like-minded entities may beg to differ but Jarrett says modern coal plants have lots of clean coal technologies.

"Technologies that scrub all kinds of pollutants and emissions out of the coal," he says, "before it goes up the smokestack."

Information found on the Department of Energy's website states the following:

Most modern power plants — and all plants built after 1978 — are required to have special devices installed that clean the sulfur from the coal's combustion gases before the gases go up the smokestack. The technical name for these devices is "flue gas desulfurization units," but most people just call them "scrubbers" — because they "scrub" the sulfur out of the smoke released by coal-burning boilers.

Today's coal plants also scrub emissions of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and mercury, Jarrett adds. As a result, he says, the nation can continue to use coal, whereas Sierra Club wants alternative energy sources that supporters claim are more environmentally friendly.

In the meantime, coal was at the top of the list last year for sources of electricity generation in the U.S. 

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Are the Democrats and their far-left policies ensuring President Trump wins re-election?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  DeVos rejects part-time reopening for schools
Leftist groups want major cuts to nation's security and justice systems
Hiring soared in May as mass layoffs eased
  US general skeptical that bounties led to troops' deaths

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Destroy the ‘public’ education system
Trump proves black workers matter
Are uncivil protests and mob violence winning?
If America is so racist, why are there so many race hoaxes?
Not dying is bad for headlines

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Shining a light on GE hypocrisy

GE logoGeneral Electric investors have been made aware of allegations the corporate giant engages in "religious liberty hypocrisy."