Baltimore still challenging pro-life pregnancy centers

Monday, August 20, 2012
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Baltimore's ordinance for pro-life pregnancy centers, or "deceptive" crisis pregnancy centers, is going back to court for another hearing, even though federal judges have ruled that it violates the centers' constitutional rights.

The truth-in-advertising ordinance forces pro-life facilities to post large signs declaring they do not do abortions or provide birth-control. Abortion clinics, however, are not required to post signs of any type. The law has already been deemed unconstitutional by a federal district court and a divided panel of judges, but Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Matt Bowman says the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the case again in December.

Bowman, Matt (ADF)"Multiple judges have ruled in favor of the pregnancy centers and have ruled that there is no abortion exception to the First Amendment and that governments cannot use the walls of pro-life centers to speak the government's own message that is antithetical to the help that pregnancy centers offer," the attorney reports.

And he says the ruling in this case will send a message to pro-life pregnancy centers nationwide.

"The government has no business taking over the walls of pro-life centers just because abortion advocates have influenced the government to force people to say things," Bowman insists. "And [in] this case almost all the judges have ruled that the government faces the highest forms of scrutiny and can't satisfy that scrutiny when they try to force people to speak a pro-abortion message."

Cases concerning similar measures are making their way through federal courts in New York and Texas. The ADF attorney asserts that any ruling unfavorable to the pro-life centers will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why is the first Trump-Clinton debate such a big deal to voters?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Analysis: In debate, Clinton was prepared, Trump was Trump
Clinton, Trump battle fiercely over taxes, race, terror
Reaction around the world to 1st Trump-Clinton debate
Houston gunman had 2 weapons, thousands of rounds at scene
Norwegians now can change genders legally with a mouse click

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The real reason for the Charlotte riots
Is Charlotte our future?
Ohio judge orders girls' bathroom access for transgender student
Riot first, ask questions later
Trump holds back on Clintons' mistreatment of women

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
TMS won't let malicious prosecution go unnoticed

Though a Chicago pro-life counselor has been cleared of the criminal charges lodged by an abortion clinic, the case may not be done just yet.