Baltimore still challenging pro-life pregnancy centers

Monday, August 20, 2012
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Baltimore's ordinance for pro-life pregnancy centers, or "deceptive" crisis pregnancy centers, is going back to court for another hearing, even though federal judges have ruled that it violates the centers' constitutional rights.

The truth-in-advertising ordinance forces pro-life facilities to post large signs declaring they do not do abortions or provide birth-control. Abortion clinics, however, are not required to post signs of any type. The law has already been deemed unconstitutional by a federal district court and a divided panel of judges, but Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Matt Bowman says the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the case again in December.

Bowman, Matt (ADF)"Multiple judges have ruled in favor of the pregnancy centers and have ruled that there is no abortion exception to the First Amendment and that governments cannot use the walls of pro-life centers to speak the government's own message that is antithetical to the help that pregnancy centers offer," the attorney reports.

And he says the ruling in this case will send a message to pro-life pregnancy centers nationwide.

"The government has no business taking over the walls of pro-life centers just because abortion advocates have influenced the government to force people to say things," Bowman insists. "And [in] this case almost all the judges have ruled that the government faces the highest forms of scrutiny and can't satisfy that scrutiny when they try to force people to speak a pro-abortion message."

Cases concerning similar measures are making their way through federal courts in New York and Texas. The ADF attorney asserts that any ruling unfavorable to the pro-life centers will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to Ted Cruz's speech & non-endorsement of Donald Trump?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump vs. Clinton: Is a 2017 'peaceful transfer' possible?
Obama: Trump's NATO comments show 'lack of preparedness'
Authorities: Munich shooter planned attack for a year
Turkey investigating people who say coup attempt was hoax
Calif. fires threaten thousands of homes; 1 body found
IS attack on Afghan protest kills at least 61, wounds 207
DNC rules meeting agrees to a compromise on superdelegates
Kaine liberal appeal muted by energy ties, abortion concerns
WNBA withdraws fines for teams that wore black warmup shirts

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump pushing for a 'Philly fight?'
Clinton faces new email scandal heading into Convention
McAuliffe to circumvent VA Sup. Ct. ruling on felon voter rights, will issue 200K clemency grants
Syrian kids hold Pokemon go photos to plead with world to 'Come and save me'
Kaine makes Clinton campaign debut amid backlash from the left

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
TMS won't let malicious prosecution go unnoticed

Though a Chicago pro-life counselor has been cleared of the criminal charges lodged by an abortion clinic, the case may not be done just yet.