Mehlman on immigration bill: 'Out of shadows' means 'amnesty'

Tuesday, July 16, 2013
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

The spokesman for a pro-illegal immigration enforcement organization agrees with a congressman that immigration legislation should have originated in the U.S. House of Representatives. 

House Ways and Means Committee chairman Dave Camp of Michigan has released a statement saying the Senate immigration legislation is in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution. He says it includes a number of revenue-related measures such as fees, penalties, surcharges, and the non-payment of taxes.

"It should have been a bill that originated in the House,” says Ira Mehlman of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

Mehlman, Ira (Federation for American Immigration Reform)“And Harry Reid has tacitly acknowledged this by saying he is not just going to send the bill over to the House as is,” explains Mehlman. “So I think that there is some recognition, at least on the part of the majority leader in the Senate, that perhaps it does violate the constitutional requirement that this sort of legislation originate in the House."

The Origination Clause of U.S. Constitution stipulates that the Senate may not "originate" any legislation that includes a provision that either raises taxes or reduces federal revenue.

Mehlman says while Camp's concerns should pull a lot of weight with the House leadership, Congressman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, has hinted that some Republicans are open to passing legislation that helps illegal aliens "come out of the shadows." 

"That is just amnesty,” states the FAIR spokesman. “Anything that allows people who violate our law to benefit from remaining in this country, having legal status to work and compete for jobs in this country.”

“And he also left open the possibility of citizenship down the line,” adds Mehlman. “That constitutes an amnesty."   

Mehlman says there is nothing that precludes the House from on its own initiative writing and passing a bad bill. So the vigilance of the American public must keep the pressure on them, he says. 

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

When will public opinion turn against the Left's efforts to force 'transgender rights' on Americans?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Origin of key Clinton emails from report a mystery
Tornado damages homes but spares small northern Kansas town
Intruders breach US airport fences about every 10 days
Pennsylvania school yearbook quotes Hitler,Stalin and Islamic terrorist
Many opt to take Social Security before full retirement age

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Katie Couric interview edited to make pro-gun activists look stupid
GOP House codifies Obama's transgenderism in dark of night
Journalist's admission a step to legitimizing pedophilia
Campus activists are more radical—and troubled—than you think
Anti-Trump thugs shout 'Viva Mexico' while burning American flag

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Keystone-related jobs a ‘blip’? Really, Mr. President?

An energy research organization finds Barack Obama's latest comments on the Keystone XL pipeline "troublesome." Those same comments also have raised the hackles of the Canadian company proposing the pipeline.