Reducing immigrant welfare

Monday, December 10, 2012
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

An immigration reform activist says there needs to be a change in U.S. immigration policy that doesn't bring in large numbers of people who inevitably wind up requiring some sort of government assistance.

The National Review recently published an article titled "Immigrant Welfare: The New Colossus," which says that immigrants are disproportionately dependent on welfare. For one thing, Department of Agriculture statistics show that the number of non-citizens on food stamps has almost quadrupled since 2001. The article also points out that the federal government has gone out of its way to encourage immigrants to apply for assistance through websites like WelcometoUSA.gov.

Mehlman, Ira (Federation for American Immigration Reform)Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), says the dependency is worsening because of the kinds of immigrants who are coming into the country.

"Because we have a policy that admits people largely based on extended family connections rather than on individual merit, the result is large numbers of people coming without the kind of human capital necessary to succeed in 21st century America," Mehlman explains.

So he contends the U.S. must come up with an immigration policy that does not permit entry of large numbers of individuals who inevitably wind up receiving some sort of assistance.

"What they ought to be looking at is reforming policies that take people based on some objective assessment of their likelihood to succeed here," he submits. "There's no perfect formula, but we can get a pretty good sense of who is likely to succeed and who isn't, and that's what our immigration policy ought to be taking into account -- a policy that is there to serve the public good, the public interest."

The FAIR spokesman adds that there needs to be an established criterion that does not rely on who the next relative in line is.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

If you had to guess how non-Christians are reacting to a hit piece against a TV couple and their church… (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Wildfire deaths include parents of 3 young men
Deputy fatally shoots robbery suspect after church break-in
Lawsuits seek to block or halt Wisconsin, Michigan recounts
Trump to nominate retired Gen. James Mattis to lead Pentagon
Tempers flare, as campaign aides assess still-raw 2016 race

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Second-chance law for young criminals puts violent offenders back on D.C. streets
Trump picks Marine Gen. James Mattis as defense secretary
18 'naughty' stores that refuse to recognize Christmas: List
Chris Christie makes his pitch to lead the Republican National Committee
France debates bill to criminalize online pro-life advocacy

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Politics 2012: Year in Review

The tumultuous presidential election, the Benghazi terrorist attack, and several shooting massacres were among many major stories on the political and national security fronts in 2012.