A conservative military watchdog doesn't think the ACLU should
be shoving its far-left-wing agenda on the nation's military
because it compromises national security.
The American Civil Liberties Union recently filed a lawsuit on
behalf of four female military service members to challenge the
Pentagon's ban on women serving in direct frontline combat units.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, is the second
such federal challenge filed by female service members this
The latest suit demands that the military change its policy that
excludes women from units like the infantry, which directly engages
enemy forces. The women feel the policy violates constitutional
equal protection rights and unfairly blocks women from promotions
and other advancements that are open to men in combat.
But Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military
Readiness (CMR), says serving in combat units is more than just
being put in harm's way.
"Here you have an ultra-liberal legal activist group, the ACLU,
going into court, and they don't even know what the definition of
combat is," Donnelly submits.
"Direct ground combat means deliberate offensive action against
the enemy. In that environment, women do not have an equal
opportunity to survive or to help fellow soldiers survive."
And the CMR president points out that the first two women to
volunteer for the Marine Corps' grueling 13-week infantry training course at its base
in Quantico, Virginia, were unable to complete it.
"That is a tough course," she accounts. "It's tough for men, as
well as women. There certainly is not a constitutional right to
pass the course, to be designated an infantry Marine or Special
Operations Forces Marine, or in the Army."
Donnelly predicts the ACLU lawsuit will ultimately fail.
A border enforcement advocate says a recent incident on the
Arizona-Mexico border illustrates the value of border fencing in
deterring illegal immigration and smuggling.