Sign up for our daily newsletter

National Security

'Workplace violence' vs. terrorism

Chad Groening   (OneNewsNow.com) Friday, October 26, 2012

A Pentagon advisor and military strategist finds it unfortunate that the Obama administration has refused to declare the November 5, 2009 Fort Hood massacre a terrorist act -- denying the victims and their families benefits.

About 160 people, including victims and their families, recently released a video expressing their frustration with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta's decision to call the horrific act "workplace violence." Thirteen people were killed and 32 were wounded when Major Nidal Hasan, a Muslim, opened fire while shouting "Allahu Akbar," which translates "god is great" in Arabic.

Now the victims are ineligible to receive Purple Hearts and are being denied other special benefits afforded soldiers who are severely wounded on the battlefield.

Maginnis, BobLt. Col. Bob Maginnis (USA-Ret.), senior fellow for national security at the Family Research Council, says it is unfortunately a judgment call.

"Most people would say a guy standing up in the middle of a military dispensary, shooting indiscriminately at innocent bystanders and declaring 'god is great' -- that's certainly a terrorist action as far as I'm concerned," he comments.

"It's truly a judgment call, and it's unfortunate for those families and those personnel who aren't going to receive the benefits. Of course the new administration, if there is one, can overturn this particular position."

Meanwhile, Texas Congressman John Carter (R), whose district includes Fort Hood, has sponsored a bill to make those benefits available to the Fort Hood victims.

Federal prosecutors earlier this week deemed the shooting at the headquarters of the Family Research Council an act of terrorism. Floyd Lee Corkins II was arrested two months ago for opening fire at the Washington, DC-based organization, injuring a security guard.


We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. (More on this policy)
comments powered by Disqus