5-year-old stood firm when told at school 'It's wrong to pray'

Tuesday, April 8, 2014
 | 
Bob Kellogg (OneNewsNow.com)

A five-year-old public school student in Florida will now be homeschooled after she was told by a school official she couldn't say grace before eating her lunch.

Jeremy Dys of the Liberty Institute, who's representing the daughter of Marcos Perez, says Carillon Elementary School in Oviedo is in violation of the Department of Education guidelines that specifically protect children who want to pray before their meal.

"Look, a five-year-old girl bowing her head and folding her hands in silent thanks for her food will never violate the Constitution," Dys tells OneNewsNow. "Not only can this little girl and others across the country pray – if school officials don't let them, not only do they violate the Constitution they can lose federal funding."

To her credit, Dys says the little girl stood her ground when she was told it was wrong to pray. The senior counsel explains what transpired:

"The lunchroom supervisor said not to do that – and she said But it's good to pray – just like her parents had taught her. And the teacher responds not with an OK, go ahead, but with a No, it's wrong to pray. And good for this little girl – she turns around and says No, it is good to pray; and she tries to do it again but is stopped a second time."

Dys and the Perez family met with school officials on Monday, and during that meeting the offending official was identified.  The school has now opened a full investigation.

Dys, Jeremy (WV Family Policy Council)

"We are grateful that Carillon Elementary School is now taking this matter seriously and conducting a thorough investigation," says Dys. "We hope that, at the conclusion of this investigation, school officials will apologize for this clear violation of the Perez family's religious liberty and begin to restore the trust of the community."

Along with the Liberty Institute statement was this statement by Marcos Perez, the girl's father: "My goal throughout this process has been to defend my daughter's religious liberty. I am thankful that the school now believes that something clearly happened when my daughter attempted to say grace and is taking swift action to correct the situation."

Mr. Perez had stated last week that while he believes they live in a good school district, he "in good conscience [couldn't] send our daughter to a school where her religious liberty has been compromised." For that reason, he said they were opting to teach her at home instead.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Should the U.S. require women to register with the Selective Service when they turn 18?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Flags at half-staff for Scalia, political fight heats up
  Army looks to recruit more women, adapt physical testing
  Latest: Bush: Senate court vote 'not important' to him
  More than 200 college students report stomach ailment
  Multiple crises challenge EU before summit
SC GOP debaters: No Obama Sup. Ct. nominee after Scalia's passing
Reaction to Sup. Ct. Justice Antonin Scalia's death
Justice Antonin Scalia dead at 79

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Republicans gear up to stop Obama naming Scalia's successor
Scalia: The best justice of our generation
Craziest debate: Trump defends Planned Parenthood, Cruz and Rubio spar, audience boos
Political battle brews over replacing Scalia, as high court decides on immigration, other key issues
Fireworks erupt between Trump and Bush, Rubio and Cruz at GOP debate

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Just 5 words would disarm the public

An attorney with Liberty Counsel doesn't think much of a former Supreme Court justice's idea of modifying the Constitution to deprive Americans of their constitutional right to bear arms.