SUPCO to hear Alabama suit against Eric Holder

Wednesday, November 14, 2012
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A black conservative organization is pleased that the Supreme Court has agreed to review a controversial section of the Voting Rights Act, which it believes is outdated and unfair to a number of states.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case Shelby County Alabama v. Eric H. Holder Jr. At issue is the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which treats modern-day state and local government decisions as if they were made by the Dixiecrats of long ago. Specifically, the plaintiff contends that the "Preclearance" Standard is now being enforced in Shelby County, Alabama, as if George Wallace was still governor -- as he was from the early 1960s through the late 1980s.            

Almasi, David (Project 21)David Almasi is a spokesman for Project 21, which has filed an amicus brief in favor of the plaintiff. He says Congress should have amended this statute in 2006 when they reauthorized the Voting Rights Act until 2031. He says the Obama administration has taken advantage of Section 5 to prevent states like Texas and South Carolina from passing voter ID laws.

"Of course, that could go either way, and they want to make sure that people realize that either it is constitutional to continue to hold perceptions from generations ago or that things need to be changed, he tells OneNewsNow.

"They need to see that Congress refused to do its job back in 2006, and they're going to strike down the portion of the act that says [basically that] You have to judge a locality by what happened decades and decades ago."

Almasi says the high court is not expected to hear arguments on the case until the fall of 2013 and will not issue a ruling until June of 2014.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How would you describe the decision to place American women in front-line combat units?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump says Indiana win means 'It's over'
Clinton faces tough crowd in WV coal country
WH: Obama not offended by comedian's language
Jury: Hawaii school failed to protect girl from rape
At least 9 Haitians killed when boat capsizes in rough seas
Education secretary calls for repeal of 2 transgender laws
Virginia GOP lawmakers to sue over felons' voting rights
Judge temporarily blocks removal of Confederate monument

LATEST FROM THE WEB

'Transgender' woman's story about harassment at NC bathroom seems to be a lie
Target stock prices plummet after 1M-strong boycott over 'transgender' bathroom policy
McConnell reveals 'pleasant conversations' with Trump, sees Hillary as 'Obama's 3rd term'
Calif. Lt. Gov. Newsom, lawmakers on collision course over gun control
Islam under fire in Europe’s two biggest nations

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Illegally imposed taxes threaten to close church

A small Arizona church is facing illegally assessed property taxes that would force it out of existence if paid.