SUPCO to hear Alabama suit against Eric Holder

Wednesday, November 14, 2012
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A black conservative organization is pleased that the Supreme Court has agreed to review a controversial section of the Voting Rights Act, which it believes is outdated and unfair to a number of states.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case Shelby County Alabama v. Eric H. Holder Jr. At issue is the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which treats modern-day state and local government decisions as if they were made by the Dixiecrats of long ago. Specifically, the plaintiff contends that the "Preclearance" Standard is now being enforced in Shelby County, Alabama, as if George Wallace was still governor -- as he was from the early 1960s through the late 1980s.            

Almasi, David (Project 21)David Almasi is a spokesman for Project 21, which has filed an amicus brief in favor of the plaintiff. He says Congress should have amended this statute in 2006 when they reauthorized the Voting Rights Act until 2031. He says the Obama administration has taken advantage of Section 5 to prevent states like Texas and South Carolina from passing voter ID laws.

"Of course, that could go either way, and they want to make sure that people realize that either it is constitutional to continue to hold perceptions from generations ago or that things need to be changed, he tells OneNewsNow.

"They need to see that Congress refused to do its job back in 2006, and they're going to strike down the portion of the act that says [basically that] You have to judge a locality by what happened decades and decades ago."

Almasi says the high court is not expected to hear arguments on the case until the fall of 2013 and will not issue a ruling until June of 2014.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What does the final Benghazi Committee report confirm most clearly about Hillary Clinton?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Authorities: 3 train workers in Texas wreck presumed dead
New laws set to take effect include abortion and vaccination restrictions
Alaska governor limits annual oil-wealth checks to $1,000
Complaint filed against prosecutor over Baltimore police case
EU to Britain: No access to single market without migration
Americans spending more than 10-hours a day on media

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Actress Patricia Heaton blasts Supreme Court abortion decision
Mother of Benghazi victim: ‘Hillary is a liar,’ ‘I would like to see Hillary in stripes’
The case for more concealed handguns
Courts say living by Christian faith illegal
The Benghazi debacle should have ended Hillary's career

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Illegally imposed taxes threaten to close church

A small Arizona church is facing illegally assessed property taxes that would force it out of existence if paid.