Quick challenge issued to new trafficking law

Tuesday, November 13, 2012
 | 
Becky Yeh - California correspondent (OneNewsNow.com)

An advocate against human trafficking labels as "frivolous" a lawsuit against a popular California proposition that increases penalties against traffickers.

The day after Proposition 35 passed, the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a lawsuit against the measure approved by a majority of voters (81% to 19%) to increase penalties against human traffickers. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday morning, targets a provision of Prop. 35 that requires sex offenders to reveal their online screen names and identities for email and social networking sites, as well as their service providers. Under the new law, traffickers also are required to register as sex offenders.

Daphne Phung, executive director of California Against Slavery, believes the legal challenge reflects misplaced priorities.

Phung

"It's really an attack on the very idea that protecting our children is more important than the sex offender's ability to exploit people," she says in reference to the lawsuit. "The claim about it being unconstitutional has been litigated many times and the courts actually have repeatedly rejected their dangerous misinterpretation of the Constitution."

The First Amendment challenge against Prop. 35 asserts that the mandate to notify police within 24 hours of activity on the Internet, such as on social networking sites or chat rooms, while "well intentioned," is too broad and "anonymously chills free speech."

But Phung says the legal challenge should not be a major obstacle. "I don't believe that it's going to impede our ability to fully implement Prop. 35 and really put a stop to the human trafficking, as well as the sexual exploitation online," she says.

Federal District Court Judge Thelton Henderson issued a temporary stay on the measure as the groups pursue their challenge. A hearing later this month will determine whether the court should issue a permanent injunction.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to the growing need for churches to have security teams/plans in place?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump says he and Mexican leader discussed wall, not payment
  Texas, other states file to support NC's restroom law
US appeals court tosses out $654 million verdict against PLO terrorists
Arizona old-guard Republicans advance in primary
Maine governor will seek 'spiritual guidance'
Judge telling school district to revoke tax hike stirs fears
Report: Texas should reduce campus transients after slaying

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Hillary cartoonist fires back at racism claim
No-loitering policies are welcomed by residents in high-crime areas
IRS doesn’t tell 1M taxpayers that illegals stole their Social Security numbers
Elderly woman beaten, set on fire in black-on-white attack
Chicago’s murder rate spirals out of control

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Illegally imposed taxes threaten to close church

A small Arizona church is facing illegally assessed property taxes that would force it out of existence if paid.