Heritage disputes magazine's '10 good things' about ObamaCare

Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Online magazine U.S. News and World Report claims there are “10 Good Things About Obamacare,” but one expert says “good” remains to be seen - and that it’s certainly not free.

"There's no such thing as a free lunch,” Chris Jacobs of The Heritage Foundation says, referring to the magazine’s claim that ObamaCare expands the number of free preventive services.


“In fact, we've seen in many cases preventive services actually raise the cost of healthcare because they are not properly targeted,” Jacobs says, citing the example of “free” flu shots given to ten people that prevented one person from catching the flu.

While U.S. News has a list of "10 Good Things," Heritage has a list of 12 implementation failures, including programs that have been criticized by Democrats. 

Also making the “10 Good Things” is the ban on excluding people with pre-existing conditions, and allowing adults up to age 26 to continue getting health insurance on their parents' policies. Those issues are favored by people on both sides of the aisle, but Jacobs believes there are ways to solve those problems without a mammoth bill and regulations.

"There are ways to do that: buying health insurance across state lines, liability reform, better use of health savings accounts and the tax code to encourage individuals to become smart shoppers of health care,” he tells OneNewsNow. “There are state-level, high-risk pools that can provide coverage to those people who are truly uninsurable."

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details
Homosexual couple 'married' in Canada challenge KY marriage law

Two homosexual men who "married" in Canada and now live in Louisville, Kentucky, have filed a federal lawsuit to have their view of marriage recognized. People with traditional values, meanwhile, are looking for state leadership to defend against a challenge to the state's marriage laws.