Well before President Barack Obama launched his 2008
presidential campaign that touted a moderate stance on same-sex
"marriage," Line of Fire radio host Dr. Michael L. Brown warned
America of the Democratic candidate's extreme
Just how radical?
"Without a doubt, Barack Obama is the [most] pro-homosexual
president in our nation's history -- and I warned my radio
listeners before he was elected that this was exactly what we could
expect from him," Brown told OneNewsNow in an exclusive
"To give just one glaring example, in June, 2009, he invited 300
gay activists to the White House to commemorate the 40th
anniversary of the Stonewall Riots, assuring these activists that
he was standing with him to see their goals fulfilled."
According to Brown, radio host of Line of
Fire, this leftist advocacy could have been detected many years
before Barack Obama's first presidential bid.
"Obama had a transgender nanny as a child in Indonesia, which
would certainly create sympathy for the transgender community,"
Brown explained. "He was influenced by pro-'gay' university
professors, and he made [it] clear as far back as 1996 that he
fully supported same-sex 'marriage.'"
Delayed progressive policies
Brown contends that Obama's
proclaimed support of traditional marriage at the beginning of his
presidency was both feigned and carefully calculated as one way of
securing his position in the White House.
"It appears clear that Obama knew that he had to take a more
traditional position on marriage in order to be elected, stating in
debates and other settings that, based on his Christian faith, he
believed marriage was the union of a man and woman," contends
Brown, president and founder of FIRE School of Ministry.
"At the same time, he began to take aim at undermining this
sacred institution, most conspicuously by refusing to defend DOMA
[the federal Defense of Marriage Act] and by pushing for the repeal
of DADT [Don't Ask, Don't Tell], which had many implications."
And Brown's take on the president's self-proclaimed full
"evolution" toward fully endorsing same-sex marriage?
"As to why he finally came out in support of same-sex 'marriage'
in May, it appears that he needed to reenergize his more radical
base, leading to massive donations generated by LGBT [Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, Transgender] supporters and their allies (such as the
left-wing Hollywood crowd)," the nationally syndicated columnist
Has Obama's unabashed support of same-sex marriage taken its
toll on America yet?
"It's too early to assess fully the effect of his endorsement of
same-sex 'marriage,' especially on a financial level. But socially,
what we can see so far is that it has cost him the support of many
black Americans -- especially among conservative Christians -- as
well as further divided the society, also making it easier to
demonize those who hold to biblical values," answered the
When asked about Obama's hand in repealing DADT, Brown expressed
that Americans can expect to experience dire consequences in the
"By fighting for the repeal of DADT, President Obama energized
his radical, left-wing base, as well as acted on his own
convictions in terms of LGBT issues," Brown replied. "As for the
consequences of the repeal, while one recent report claimed that
things have gone without a hitch in the first year, many anecdotal
reports claim that this is anything but the case and that
there are real threats to freedoms of conscience and religion,
along with challenges to morale. It remains to be seen what the
lasting effects will be."
Many conservatives claim that Obama's relentless promotion of
homosexual behavior in his foreign policy has not been paralleled
by any other president in United States history, especially when
examining the policies he has enforced through the U.S.
"Without question, the president's aggressive promotion of
homosexual activism to other nations is unprecedented, including
some of our foreign embassies participating in gay pride events, as
well as Secretary of State Clinton putting pressure on the nations
of the world to accede to the demands of gay activism, implying
that there would be consequences for not complying," Brown pointed
The election and beyond
And what about the future of DOMA? Does Brown believe that the
Obama administration's refusal to defend the act will end in its
"President Obama's refusal to defend DOMA was outrageous," Brown
argues. "DOMA has been legally passed and upheld by the Congress
and ratified by President Clinton, and it is not up to the
president to decide which laws he will uphold. And DOMA is coming
under increasing pressure from the courts. If Obama has four more
years in office, the results could be catastrophic for DOMA."
Brown says that a Romney win could possibly salvage the
protection of marriage as between one man and one woman.
"On the other hand, Governor Romney claims that he will stand up
for DOMA if elected," the Hebrew scholar asserts. "At the same
time, the overall question of same-sex 'marriage' could well be
decided by the Supreme Court within the next 12 months -- so this
will be a very volatile time for the issue."
With Obama's staunch support of the h-agenda in the latter half
of his presidency, Brown believes that he has alienated himself
from African Americans, while stigmatizing Bible-believing
Christians as being hate-filled and bigoted -- noting these
dealings as a couple of factors that could severely hurt his
But will a Romney election work to dampen the h-agenda's flames
that Obama has fanned?
"I would hope that a Romney election would help stem the tide of
homosexual activism, both on a popular level (it will not be
glorified and supported as it was under Obama) and a practical
level (with Romney's administration doing what it could to stand
against the activist goals)," Brown shared. "However, I am
concerned by Romney's previous track record on these issues while
governing Massachusetts, and he might well gravitate to a more
neutral position once elected."
And is there any indication of what the climate for homosexual
behavior will look like in 2016 if Obama is reelected -- especially
in lieu of Obama telling the LGBT community at the White House in
June that his pro-gay agenda has only just begun ... with the
President stating that he's not just their friend, but their
"If we have four more years of President Obama -- barring true,
national revival in the Church that would lead to a cultural
awakening -- it could well be that same-sex 'marriage' will be the
law of the land and the norm taught in schools," Brown warns. He
continued, contending "that those opposing [his redefinition of
marriage] will be officially classified as bigots, that public
criticism of gay activism would be virtually forbidden, and that
churches (and synagogues and even mosques) that differ with gay
activism will be persecuted ... for their stands."