Mayor dictating what homeless eat

Thursday, March 22, 2012
 | 
Russ Jones (OneNewsNow.com)
A major U.S. city is banning the private sector from donating food to homeless shelters, as a public policy organization says the city and its leaders have replaced common sense with political correctness.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's (D) administration is now banning all food being offered to the city's homeless shelters. In conjunction with a mayoral task force, the Department of Health and the Department of Homeless Services have recently begun enforcing new nutritional rules for food served at city shelters. Jeff Stier is director of the risk analysis division at The National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank institute. He laments that good Samaritans wanting to donate food are now turned away. Jeff Stier"I think this is an abuse of taxpayer dollars for the mayor to try to control how we live," Stier offers. "And he's actually having the effect of discouraging donations, private sector donations, to the homeless and trying to expand the scope and responsibility of government, which is really going in the wrong direction." Officials with the Department of Homeless Services contend the ban is consistent with Mayor Bloomberg's emphasis on "improving nutrition for all New Yorkers." The think tank senior fellow, however, says it is the nanny state at its worst. "The recipients, the beneficiaries, or as some here might call them, 'victims,' have so much appreciated not only the food, but the gesture of people from the community including them and caring for them," Stier notes. "And the mayor is saying, no -- you're only going to eat the institutional food that we provide. That's outrageous!"

The new inter-agency controls what can be served at facilities for the homeless. Serving sizes, salt, fat, and calorie contents will be dictated, as will fiber minimums and condiment recommendations.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Of the four media hosts/moderators for the 2016 election debates, which do you most trust to be fair?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

The Latest: Grandparents of school shooter found father dead
Officials: Suspect in Texas slayings was in US illegally
Tropical Storm Matthew lashes islands of eastern Caribbean
Some evacuation orders lifted in Calif. wildfire areas
House OKs plan for $170M to fix Flint water system
South Carolina school shooting: 3 wounded; teen in custody
Congress overrides Obama's veto of Sept. 11 bill
Deal reached to keep US government running, help Flint

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Polls: Post-debate Clinton can't get beyond margin of error
GOP lauds Obama's 9/11 veto override: 'Righting that terrible wrong'
Dem lawmaker wears Hillary pin during House hearing on Clinton email probe
Saudi Arabia, Gulf States prepare to strike back following 9/11 bill veto override
The real agenda behind Charlotte's 'peaceful' protests: Anti-white, anti-American values

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Protecting Calif. students from 'adult seduction'
A family advocate thinks a new bill in California that would make it illegal for teachers to have "suggestive" relationships with students, even when the students are 18, is "a step in the right direction."