The pipeline's revised route

Tuesday, December 4, 2012
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

A public hearing over the revised route of the Keystone XL pipeline is planned for today in Nebraska.

The hearing comes ahead of a final decision by Governor Dave Heineman as to whether the revised route avoids an "ecologically sensitive" area of Nebraska. Heineman has spoken out in favor of the pipeline in the past.

Loris, Nick (Heritage)Nick Loris, an economist focusing on energy, environmental and regulatory issues with The Heritage Foundation, believes the governor will give his approval for the project.

"I would guess yes, although I never want to speculate what's going to happen," Loris comments. "But at the same time, after the Keystone XL pipeline permit was originally rejected, Nebraska officials were publicly for the pipeline, so long as it met their needs. The fact that they're rerouting the pipeline should suffice for meeting their needs. They've always wanted to build the pipeline; they just wanted to make sure their citizens' concerns were taken care of."

Following his reelection, rumors began swirling that President Obama would approve the pipeline. At that time, Loris believed the rumors were true. But, the fact that the president has catered to his constituencies before, and that he does not have to face another election means he can really do whatever he wants to make whomever he wants happy.

A recent editorial in The Globe and Mail, a Canadian newspaper, admits that some of the concerns about a pipeline carrying Canadian bitumen are "valid," but it calls on President Obama to approve the pipeline nonetheless.

The Keystone XL pipeline was proposed in 2008, but President Obama rejected a GOP proposal to fast-track approval in January 2012, citing "the arbitrary nature of a deadline that prevented the State Department from gathering the information necessary to approve the project and protect the American people."

However, a State Department environmental impact report in August 2011 stated that the pipeline would pose "no significant impacts" to most resources if environmental protection measures are followed, while also acknowledging the pipeline would present "significant adverse effects to certain cultural resources." The State Department postponed a final decision in November 2011.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

When will public opinion turn against the Left's efforts to force 'transgender rights' on Americans?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump says he no longer wants to debate Sanders
Never mind Trump, GOP uniting under banner: 'Never Hillary'
NKorea threatens South's ships after sea border chase
Trump tells California 'there is no drought'
Latest: Storms halt all flights into Houston airport
FACT CHECK: Clinton misstates key facts in email episode
Trump breaks with nation's only Latina governor

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Can Trump make inroads with union voters?
It's official: Rubio is not running for re-election
Muslim mob torches Christians' homes in Egypt, strip elderly woman naked in streets
Trump: It would be 'inappropriate' to debate Sanders
Regional United Methodist groups deny breaking rules against hiring homosexual clergy

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Business 2012: Year in Review

The year 2012 was a busy year, but some of the biggest news was in regards to business and the environment.