The pipeline's revised route

Tuesday, December 4, 2012
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

A public hearing over the revised route of the Keystone XL pipeline is planned for today in Nebraska.

The hearing comes ahead of a final decision by Governor Dave Heineman as to whether the revised route avoids an "ecologically sensitive" area of Nebraska. Heineman has spoken out in favor of the pipeline in the past.

Loris, Nick (Heritage)Nick Loris, an economist focusing on energy, environmental and regulatory issues with The Heritage Foundation, believes the governor will give his approval for the project.

"I would guess yes, although I never want to speculate what's going to happen," Loris comments. "But at the same time, after the Keystone XL pipeline permit was originally rejected, Nebraska officials were publicly for the pipeline, so long as it met their needs. The fact that they're rerouting the pipeline should suffice for meeting their needs. They've always wanted to build the pipeline; they just wanted to make sure their citizens' concerns were taken care of."

Following his reelection, rumors began swirling that President Obama would approve the pipeline. At that time, Loris believed the rumors were true. But, the fact that the president has catered to his constituencies before, and that he does not have to face another election means he can really do whatever he wants to make whomever he wants happy.

A recent editorial in The Globe and Mail, a Canadian newspaper, admits that some of the concerns about a pipeline carrying Canadian bitumen are "valid," but it calls on President Obama to approve the pipeline nonetheless.

The Keystone XL pipeline was proposed in 2008, but President Obama rejected a GOP proposal to fast-track approval in January 2012, citing "the arbitrary nature of a deadline that prevented the State Department from gathering the information necessary to approve the project and protect the American people."

However, a State Department environmental impact report in August 2011 stated that the pipeline would pose "no significant impacts" to most resources if environmental protection measures are followed, while also acknowledging the pipeline would present "significant adverse effects to certain cultural resources." The State Department postponed a final decision in November 2011.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Who is most easily fooled by the utopian promises of socialism and communism? (Choose up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Police officer fatally shot in eastern Tennessee
California boy in legal fight dies after ventilator removed
Israel rejects immunity for indicted UN engineer in Gaza
2 nuns killed in Mississippi; signs point to home break-in
Chelsea Clinton to remain on family foundation board
Trump rebukes Clinton's racism claims
Mylan says it will expand programs that lower EpiPen costs
Catholic group says its Walgreens clinics will offer birth control

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Escalation? U.S. Navy fires warning shots at Iranian ship
Trump rules out legal status for aliens: They must 'leave the country'
Republican calls grow for second look at Clinton case
Trump barely makes Minnesota ballot
Pastor confirms Trump gave $100K donation for Louisiana flood relief

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Business 2012: Year in Review

The year 2012 was a busy year, but some of the biggest news was in regards to business and the environment.