Obama, Clinton accused of holding a 'Dred Scott' view on abortion
Jim Brown - OneNewsNow - 4/14/2008 12:50:00 PMBookmark and Share

Adult hand and Baby handA prominent evangelical Christian political activist says both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama appeared "halting and uncomfortable" during a recent "Compassion Forum" on CNN when they were asked serious questions about religious liberty, when life begins, and how God created the universe. 

 

Both Democratic presidential candidates reiterated their support for abortion-on-demand during the forum. But when asked if life begins at conception, Senator Clinton (D-New York) would only say "the potential for life begins at conception," while Senator Obama (D-Illinois) claimed the subject was "something that I have not come to a firm resolution on."
 
Rob Schenck, president of the conservative National Clergy Council, says the event last night reaffirmed that neither Obama nor Clinton are "in the most important ways" compatible with the core beliefs of Evangelicals or core convictions of Christian traditionalists of any kind.
 
"There was no room in either the thinking of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama for anyone who truly believes that all human life is precious at all stages of development from conception until natural death," explains Schneck. "They have a stratified philosophy of the value of human life," he continues, describing that philosophy as one that believes "there are some humans who are more valuable than others; there are humans who are not really human persons.
 
"Now that's Dred Scott language," he adds. "That's what the pro-slavers believed."
 
Schenck contends pro-life voters need to "read between the lines" because both Democratic candidates are working with professional speech coaches and they will give just enough information to "beguile" voters. "We have to be extremely discerning in this -- prayerfully, carefully, biblically discerning ..." in reading what was not said, he advises.
 
He also maintains that both Clinton and Obama have "no real moral philosophy" or any room for Christians who believe that "all human life is of equal value in the eyes of God."
 
The National Clergy Council president contends the two candidates were hiding a great deal of what they truly believe last night because they know they have to connect with Evangelicals to win an election. According to Schenck, it appeared the two were "swallowing a bitter pill."

 

iTunes Podcast

 

Rate this Story (1 Star = Not so Good -and- 5 Stars = Excellent!)

Please log in to comment on this story.

Click here to log in


  (average 4.5 out of 5)


View Comments

Other Stories in Election 2008
Spreading Obama's wealth to pro-life ministries
Praying for president-elect Obama
This election's in your court now...
Minnesota Senate recount 'unfair' to both candidates
Louisiana bucks national election trend
New congressman 'strong' on family values
Senate advised to distance itself from Minn. recount
Chambliss victory - momentum for GOP?
One month later, Senate race still up in the air
Jewish Obama supporters 'wandering in political desert'
Military absentee ballots not counted in Virginia
Barna breaks down the 'faith' vote
Voters distrust 'diluted' GOP
Did 'fawning' media elect Obama?
Christians should 'still pray' for new president
Economy trumps abortion among Latino Catholics
Michigan town turns back 'gay rights' ordinance
Trusting God with election results
Obama-Reagan similarities?
Pro-lifers gear up to fight Obama's radical agenda


If you believe OneNewsNow.com is an important source for Christian news,
please consider a
 
small tax-deductible gift for this service. 





2/9/2010 9:28:23 AM