Group wary of Obama's faith-based programs expansion
Jim Brown - OneNewsNow - 7/1/2008 2:25:00 PMBookmark and Share

Barack ObamaA liberal group known for its opposition to Christian expression in the public square is critical of Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's proposed faith-based initiative.

 

Obama has announced he will create a new "Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships" if he becomes president. The Illinois senator says he "believe[s] deeply in the separation of church and state," but that his program will not endanger that idea. Obama says under his plan, faith-based groups that receive a federal grant will not be allowed to "proselytize" the people they help or hire people based on their religious beliefs.  Also, federal dollars that go directly to churches, temples, and mosques can only be used on secular programs. (see video of Obama announcement)
 
Rob Boston is a spokesman for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which has been highly critical of President Bush's faith-based initiative.
 
"This sort of tweaking of the plan by Senator Obama does present us with some concerns," Boston admits. "In our view, the faith-based initiative is a really flawed concept and it should be scrapped entirely. Obama's talking about an actual expansion of the plan and renaming and changing some of the details -- but it seems to us that the entire concept will still remain intact."
 
The Americans United spokesman says religious organizations should not be asking the government for a "handout" to run their social services. "If a church wants to run a soup kitchen or a homeless shelter or some other type of program, that's great -- and a pastor should ask the congregation to pay for it," states Boston. "It shouldn't ask the Department of Health and Human Services or some other federal agency [for the money to do that]. If the people sitting in the pews really believe strongly in this program, they'll dig deeper and they'll fund it."

 


Rate this Story (1 Star = Not so Good -and- 5 Stars = Excellent!)

Please log in to comment on this story.

Click here to log in


Comments on this article:
  • "There is no concept of separation of church and state - I really wish people would think for themselves, research the constitution for themselves and get it right for a change."
  • "Using federal funds to help religious organizations help the needy is not an establishment of religion. Obama does not represent "CHANGE;" he is like every other politician - ignorant and supports whatever issue that might help get him elected."
  • ""Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...""
  • "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech"
  • "I don't see a big conflict constitution wise if your not subsidizing the social work of one denomination or religion in an exclusionary way....However from an economic view our churches are far more efficient than the federal government is. To pay taxes to Uncle Sam and have have the money funnel/diluted down through government red tape is a waste of our dollars. The churches do a wonderful job with health centers, day cares, after school programs, old age homes. The minute you depend on a check from the government you become a slave to them. I felt the same way when George Bush started the program. Inspiring words from Obama on his faith, you never hear McCain talk about his faith."
  • "I am a Christian and I disagree with churches taking money from the Feds once Bush leaves office especially if Obama is going to be in control of the Gov't. Bush motive I believe was to help churches feed the poor, clothes and house the hungry when he opened public funding to them. I believe Obama's motive for continuing public funding to the churches are a first step to exploit and control. Next, Obama will begin to instruct churches to change their policy to make it a more secular progressive friendly community."
  • "The federal government should not be writing checks to churches. Period."
  • "The concept of Obama giving dollars to a faith based program scares me to death. Where would it go to bastions of Christianity like Wrights church or maybe Farrakhan's. He has a reputation and history of associating himself with anti American, anti Christian people and organizations. He is the last person on the face of the earth I would want to be pouring money into faith based groups. Who's faith, he certainly has not shown any indication it would be faith in God through Christ, more likely faith in Allah through the devil. Distributing funds to faith based organizations is something I would NEVER trust Barak Hussien Obama with."

Other Stories in Election 2008
Group wary of Obama's faith-based programs expansion
Obama to expand Bush's faith-based programs
FL televangelist under IRS investigation
Activist leaves McCain meeting 'a changed man'
Meetings with Obama confusing Evangelicals
Activist: Christians shouldn't neglect voting
Michelle Obama confirms husband's support for homosexual causes
Will pro-abortion Catholics be excommunicated?
Obama campaign worker helps set up anti-Dobson site
Of saints and smears
Evangelicals still a question mark for McCain
Pastor takes issue with Dobson's Obama comments
Will Obama get Cuba's vote?
Dobson and Obama
Obama, supporters attack Dobson
Obama 'naive' on national security
Democrats woo Evangelicals
Obama's Catholic support squad
Obama snubs Islamic radical activists
CAIR: Obama avoidance of Muslims not his fault


If you believe OneNewsNow.com is an important source for Christian news,
please consider a
 
small tax-deductible gift for this service.